Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25893794›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2015

Prevalence estimation for monogenic autosomal recessive diseases using population-based genetic data.

Steven J Schrodi, Andrea DeBarber, Max He, Zhan Ye, Peggy Peissig, Jeffrey J Van Wormer, Robert Haws, Murray H Brilliant, Robert D Steiner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bayesian Population-Based Prevalence Estimation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Hereditary fructose intolerance: A comprehensive review.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Steven J SchrodiCenter for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, 1000 N Oak Ave-MLR, Marshfield, WI, 54449, USA, schrodi.steven@mcrf.mfldclin.edu.
Andrea DeBarber
Max He
Zhan Ye
Peggy Peissig
Jeffrey J Van Wormer
Robert Haws
Murray H Brilliant
Robert D Steiner
Center for Human Genetics · USMarshfield Clinic · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic methods can complement epidemiological surveys and clinical registries in determining prevalence of monogenic autosomal recessive diseases. Several large population-based genetic databases, such as the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project, are now publically available. By assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of individuals homozygous in the general population for a particular pathogenic allele can be directly calculated from a sample of chromosomes where some harbor the pathogenic allele. Further assuming that the penetrance of the pathogenic allele(s) is known, the prevalence of recessive phenotypes can be determined. Such work can inform public health efforts for rare recessive diseases. A Bayesian estimation procedure has yet to be applied to the problem of estimating disease prevalence from large population-based genetic data. A Bayesian framework is developed to derive the posterior probability density of monogenic, autosomal recessive phenotypes. Explicit equations are presented for the credible intervals of these disease prevalence estimates. A primary impediment to performing accurate disease prevalence calculations is the determination of truly pathogenic alleles. This issue is discussed, but in many instances remains a significant barrier to investigations solely reliant on statistical interrogation--functional studies can provide important information for solidifying evidence of variant pathogenicity. We also discuss several challenges to these efforts, including the population structure in the sample of chromosomes, the treatment of allelic heterogeneity, and reduced penetrance of pathogenic variants. To illustrate the application of these methods, we utilized recently published genetic data collected on a large sample from the Schmiedeleut Hutterites. We estimate prevalence and calculate 95% credible intervals for 13 autosomal recessive diseases using these data. In addition, the Bayesian estimation procedure is applied to data from a central European study of hereditary fructose intolerance. The methods described herein show a viable path to robustly estimating both the expected prevalence of autosomal recessive phenotypes and corresponding credible intervals using population-based genetic databases that have recently become available. As these genetic databases increase in number and size with the advent of cost-effective next-generation sequencing, we anticipate that these methods and approaches may be helpful in recessive disease prevalence calculations, potentially impacting public health management, health economic analyses, and treatment of rare diseases.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenes, RecessiveModels, GeneticAllelesAnimalsBayes TheoremGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetics, PopulationHumansPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID25893794
OpenAlexW2055502678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.