Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25893663›Full record

ArticlePediatric obesity2016

Inconsistencies and inaccuracies in reporting on choice of endpoints and of statistical results in RCT of maternal diet.

D W Lewis, D A Fields, D B Allison

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric obesity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Goals in Nutrition Science 2015-2020.Frontiers in nutrition · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D W LewisInstitute for Rural Health Research, College of Community Health Sciences, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
D A FieldsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Norman, OK, USA.
D B AllisonOffice of Energetics and Nutrition Obesity Research Center, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI James O Hill · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
Strengthening Causal Inference in Behavioral Obesity ResearchR25HL124208 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ALLISON, DAVID B, BROWN, ANDREW W · 2014 to 2023
$1.8M
The Mathematical Sciences in Obesity ResearchR25DK099080 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DAVID B ALLISON, Andrew W Brown · 2013 to 2026
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R25 HL124208NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK099080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDietFamilyHumans

Identifiers

PMID25893663
PMCPMC4615270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.