Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25893636›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical immunology2015

TREC Based Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease: A Systematic Review.

Jet van der Spek, Rolf H H Groenwold, Mirjam van der Burg, Joris M van Montfrans

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. First pilot study for newborn screening of severe T and B lymphopenias in ColombiaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jet van der SpekDepartment of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rolf H H Groenwold
Mirjam van der Burg
Joris M van Montfrans
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewborn screening (NBS) by quantifying T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) in neonatal dried blood spots (DBS) enables early diagnosis of severe combined immunodeficiency disease (SCID). In recent years, different screening algorithms for TREC based SCID screening were reported. PURPOSE: To systematically review the diagnostic performance of published algorithms for TREC based NBS for SCID.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for case series and prospective cohort studies describing TREC based NBS for SCID. We extracted TREC content and cut-off values, number of retests, repeat DBS and referrals, and type and number of typical SCID and other T cell lymphopenia (TCL) cases. We calculated positive predictive value (PPV), test sensitivity and SCID incidence.

resultsThirteen studies were included, re-confirming 89 known SCID cases in case series and reporting 53 new SCID cases in 3.15 million newborns. In case series, the sensitivity for typical SCID was 100%. In the prospective cohort studies, SCID incidence was ~1.7:100,000, re-test rate was 0.20-3.26%, repeat DBS rate 0.0-0.41% and referral rate 0.01-1.35%. PPV within the five largest cohorts was 0.8-11.2% for SCID and 18.3-81.0% for TCL. Individual TREC contents in all SCID patients was <25 TRECs/μl (except in those evaluated with the New York State assay).

conclusionsThe sensitivity of TREC based NBS for typical SCID was 100 %. The TREC cut-off score determines the percentage of non-SCID TCL cases detected in newborn screening for TCL. Adapting the screening algorithm for pre-term/ill infants reduces the amount of false positive test results.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningAlgorithmsDNA, CircularHumansInfantInfant, NewbornReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyDNA, CircularReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID25893636
PMCPMC4438204
OpenAlexW2016524406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.