Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25893594›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2015

Fueling Hope: Stem Cells in Social Media.

Julie M Robillard, Emanuel Cabral, Craig Hennessey, Brian K Kwon, Judy Illes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julie M RobillardNational Core for Neuroethics, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada, jrobilla@mail.ubc.ca.
Emanuel Cabral
Craig Hennessey
Brian K Kwon
Judy Illes
University of British Columbia · CABritish Columbia Institute of Technology · CANeuroDevNet · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media is broadening opportunities to engage in discussions about biomedical advances such as stem cell research. However, little is known about how information pertaining to stem cells is disseminated on platforms such as Twitter. To fill this gap, we conducted a content analysis of tweets containing (i) a stem cell keyword, and (ii) a keyword related to either spinal cord injury (SCI) or Parkinson disease (PD). We found that the discussion about stem cells and SCI or PD revolves around different aspects of the research process. We also found that the tone of most tweets about stem cells is either positive or neutral. The findings contribute new knowledge about Twitter as a connecting platform for many voices and as a key tool for the dissemination of information about stem cells and disorders of the central nervous system.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Information ExchangeHumansInformation DisseminationInternetParkinson DiseaseSocial MediaSpinal Cord InjuriesStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID25893594
OpenAlexW2073294158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.