ArticleJournal of community genetics2015
SCA2 predictive testing in Cuba: challenging concepts and protocol evolution.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic Organization, Evolutionary Conservation and Expression ofBiomedicines · 2025Article
- RNA Toxicity and Perturbation of rRNA Processing in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021Article
- Ethical issues in neurogenetics.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018Review
- Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: Clinicogenetic Aspects, Mechanistic Insights, and Management Approaches.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by a CAG repeat expansion in the ATXN2 gene. Cuba has the highest prevalence (6.57 cases/10(5) inhabitants) of SCA2 in the world. The existence of 753 affected individuals and 7173 relatives at risk prompted the development in 2001 of the first predictive testing program in the country. The medical records of over 1193 individuals, who requested the test within a 13-year period, were analyzed retrospectively. The presymptomatic and the prenatal tests had uptake rates of 43.4 and 23.9 %, respectively. Several ethical challenges resulted from this program. These include the following: (1) withdrawal due to the initial protocol's length; (2) the request to participate by 16 at-risk adolescents; (3) the decision made by ten out of 33 couples with a test-positive fetus to carry the pregnancy to term, leading to de facto predictive testing of minors; (4) the elevated frequency of the ATXN2 gene large normal alleles (≥23 to 31 repeats) in the reference population. These issues have led to major changes in the guidelines of the predictive testing protocol: (1) the protocol length was shortened; (2) the inclusion criteria were expanded to reach at-risk adolescents with an interest in prenatal diagnosis; (3) interdisciplinary follow-up was offered to families in which test-positive fetuses were not aborted; (4) prenatal testing was made available to carriers of large normal alleles with ≥27 CAG repeats. The profiles of the participants were similar to those reported for other predictive testing programs for conditions like Huntington disease and familial adenomatous polyposis. The genetic counseling practices at the community level, the ample health education provided to the at-risk population, together with multidisciplinary and specialized attention to the affected families, are lessons from the Cuban experience that can be relevant for other international teams conducting predictive testing for other late-onset neurodegenerative disorders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.