Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25893452›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2015

Consolidation and maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma after autologous transplantation: where do we stand?

M Mohty, P G Richardson, P L McCarthy, M Attal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Cryopreservation and storage patterns of hematopoietic progenitor stem cells for multiple myeloma.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chart review across EU5 in MM post-ASCT patients.International journal of hematologic oncology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M Mohty1] Service d'Hématologie Clinique et Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France [2] Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France [3] INSERM, UMRs 938, Paris, France.
P G RichardsonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Boston, MA, USA.
P L McCarthyBlood and Marrow Transplant Program, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
M AttalHématologie Clinique, Hôpital Purpan, and Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT), Toulouse, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHôpital Purpan · FRRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel agents including proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs are now routinely utilized as part of the induction regimen before transplantation and this has resulted in substantial improvements in the depth of response achieved before transplant. Given that depth of response is prognostic for overall outcome, a number of studies have been conducted or are ongoing to investigate the use of novel agents as consolidation and maintenance therapy after transplant. Most clinical trials have reported after consolidation and maintenance therapy an increased PFS and even overall survival in some of them. The use of post-autologous stem cell transplant consolidation and maintenance is an increasingly attractive concept. However, some side effects could be observed with such long-term therapy and many open questions are still under debate. The decision to administer consolidation and/or maintenance therapy will likely need to be guided by the individual patient situation. This review aims to analyze the currently available research evidence in this field.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAutograftsConsolidation ChemotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMultiple MyelomaSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID25893452
OpenAlexW2041567080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.