Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25893251›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Scirtothrips dorsalis Species Complex: Endemism and Invasion in a Global Pest.

Aaron M Dickey, Vivek Kumar, Mark S Hoddle, Joe E Funderburk, J Kent Morgan, Antonella Jara-Cavieres, Robert G Shatters, Lance S Osborne, Cindy L McKenzie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DNA barcoding of selectedMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aaron M DickeyMid-Florida Research & Education Center, University of Florida, Apopka, Florida, United States of America; US Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America.
Vivek KumarMid-Florida Research & Education Center, University of Florida, Apopka, Florida, United States of America; US Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America.
Mark S HoddleDepartment of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America; Center for Invasive Species Research, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America.
Joe E FunderburkNorth Florida Research & Education Center, University of Florida, Quincy, Florida, United States of America.
J Kent MorganUS Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America.
Antonella Jara-CavieresUS Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America; Indian River Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America.
Robert G ShattersUS Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America.
Lance S OsborneMid-Florida Research & Education Center, University of Florida, Apopka, Florida, United States of America.
Cindy L McKenzieUS Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive arthropods pose unique management challenges in various environments, the first of which is correct identification. This apparently mundane task is particularly difficult if multiple species are morphologically indistinguishable but accurate identification can be determined with DNA barcoding provided an adequate reference set is available. Scirtothrips dorsalis is a highly polyphagous plant pest with a rapidly expanding global distribution and this species, as currently recognized, may be comprised of cryptic species. Here we report the development of a comprehensive DNA barcode library for S. dorsalis and seven nuclear markers via next-generation sequencing for identification use within the complex. We also report the delimitation of nine cryptic species and two morphologically distinguishable species comprising the S. dorsalis species complex using histogram analysis of DNA barcodes, Bayesian phylogenetics, and the multi-species coalescent. One member of the complex, here designated the South Asia 1 cryptic species, is highly invasive, polyphagous, and likely the species implicated in tospovirus transmission. Two other species, South Asia 2, and East Asia 1 are also highly polyphagous and appear to be at an earlier stage of global invasion. The remaining members of the complex are regionally endemic, varying in their pest status and degree of polyphagy. In addition to patterns of invasion and endemism, our results provide a framework both for identifying members of the complex based on their DNA barcode, and for future species delimiting efforts.

Indexed as

InternationalityIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsBayes TheoremElectron Transport Complex IVGenetic LociGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationPhylogenyPhylogeographySequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityThysanopteraElectron Transport Complex IV

Identifiers

PMID25893251
PMCPMC4404325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.