Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25892908›Full record

ReviewMycobiology2015

Current technologies and related issues for mushroom transformation.

Sinil Kim, Byeong-Suk Ha, Hyeon-Su Ro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mycobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Towards engineering agaricomycete fungi for terpenoid production.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  4. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A WD40 Protein Encoding GeneFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Establishment of an efficient transformation system for Pleurotus ostreatus.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sinil KimDivision of Applied Life Science and Research Institute for Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea.
Byeong-Suk HaDivision of Applied Life Science and Research Institute for Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea.
Hyeon-Su RoDivision of Applied Life Science and Research Institute for Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mushroom transformation requires a series of experimental steps, including generation of host strains with a desirable selective marker, design of vector DNA, removal of host cell wall, introduction of foreign DNA across the cell membrane, and integration into host genomic DNA or maintenance of an autonomous vector DNA inside the host cell. This review introduces limitations and obstacles related to transformation technologies along with possible solutions. Current methods for cell wall removal and cell membrane permeabilization are summarized together with details of two popular technologies, Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation and restriction enzyme-mediated integration.

Indexed as

AgrobacteriumMushroomProtoplastREMITransformation

Identifiers

PMID25892908
PMCPMC4397374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.