Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25892757›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2015

Evaluation of different methods of stunning/killing sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) by tissue stress/quality indicators.

Giulia Zampacavallo, Giuliana Parisi, Massimo Mecatti, Paola Lupi, Gianluca Giorgi, Bianca Maria Poli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Electronarcosis of Nile tilapia (Recent advances in food, nutrition & agriculture · 2025
    Article
  5. Pre-Slaughter Stunning Methods Influence the Meat Quality ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  6. Effect ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Twenty Years of Research in Seabass and Seabream Welfare during Slaughter.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giulia ZampacavalloDISPAA (Department of Scienze delle Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell'Ambiente), Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Giuliana ParisiDISPAA (Department of Scienze delle Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell'Ambiente), Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Massimo MecattiDISPAA (Department of Scienze delle Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell'Ambiente), Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Paola LupiDISPAA (Department of Scienze delle Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell'Ambiente), Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Gianluca GiorgiDISPAA (Department of Scienze delle Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell'Ambiente), Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Bianca Maria PoliDISPAA (Department of Scienze delle Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell'Ambiente), Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy ; DISPAA, Scuola di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Firenze, via delle Cascine 5, 50144 Firenze, Italy.
University of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect on the final product quality of certain innovative stunning/killing methods for sea bass as substitutes for the most common methods used by European farmers. The changes in tissue stress/quality parameters were monitored from the first hours after death and during the shelf life of the fish. Two trials were conducted in July and November on n. 231 sea bass stunned/killed by ice-water slurry, by single gas or mixture of gases in ice-water and by single- or two-stage electrical stunning/killing methods. Behavioural responses, stun/death time, rigor index, muscular and ocular pH, lactic acid, ATP and catabolites at death and within the 24 h after death were determined. In the November trial, the sensorial evaluation, rigor index, IMP, inosine, hypoxanthine, and K1 values were also evaluated during refrigerated storage until spoilage. The stunning/killing in ice-water appeared to induce low effects on the analysed parameters and preserve a good product quality as indicated by the highest pH and ATP values at death, the delayed full rigor onset and the 1 day longer shelf life (14 days) in comparison with the single- or two-stage electrical stunning/killing. The gas mixture addition provided a 40 % shortening of the time to obtain stunning/killing and 14 days of shelf life. The actual level of quality loss with the different killing conditions and the actual impact of a significant shortage of rigor mortis onset and pH drop on the possible pre-rigor filleting remain to be studied in depth.

Indexed as

Quality changesSea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)Stress indicatorsStunning/killing methods

Identifiers

PMID25892757
PMCPMC4397339
OpenAlexW2081431189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.