Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25892555›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2015

E2F1 and E2F2 induction in response to DNA damage preserves genomic stability in neuronal cells.

Daniela S Castillo, Anna Campalans, Laura M Belluscio, Abel L Carcagno, J Pablo Radicella, Eduardo T Cánepa, Nicolás Pregi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. GCN5L: a critical target in energy metabolism pathways.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniela S Castilloa Laboratorio de Biología Molecular; Departamento de Química Biológica; Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales ; Universidad de Buenos Aires ; Ciudad de Buenos Aires , Argentina.
Anna Campalans
Laura M Belluscio
Abel L Carcagno
J Pablo Radicella
Eduardo T Cánepa
Nicolás Pregi
Fundación Ciencias Exactas y Naturales · ARUniversity of Buenos Aires · ARDélégation Paris 7 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E2F transcription factors regulate a wide range of biological processes, including the cellular response to DNA damage. In the present study, we examined whether E2F family members are transcriptionally induced following treatment with several genotoxic agents, and have a role on the cell DNA damage response. We show a novel mechanism, conserved among diverse species, in which E2F1 and E2F2, the latter specifically in neuronal cells, are transcriptionally induced after DNA damage. This upregulation leads to increased E2F1 and E2F2 protein levels as a consequence of de novo protein synthesis. Ectopic expression of these E2Fs in neuronal cells reduces the level of DNA damage following genotoxic treatment, while ablation of E2F1 and E2F2 leads to the accumulation of DNA lesions and increased apoptotic response. Cell viability and DNA repair capability in response to DNA damage induction are also reduced by the E2F1 and E2F2 deficiencies. Finally, E2F1 and E2F2 accumulate at sites of oxidative and UV-induced DNA damage, and interact with γH2AX DNA repair factor. As previously reported for E2F1, E2F2 promotes Rad51 foci formation, interacts with GCN5 acetyltransferase and induces histone acetylation following genotoxic insult. The results presented here unveil a new mechanism involving E2F1 and E2F2 in the maintenance of genomic stability in response to DNA damage in neuronal cells.

Indexed as

DNA DamageGenomic InstabilityCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCycloheximideDactinomycinDNA RepairE2F1 Transcription FactorE2F2 Transcription FactorHEK293 CellsHistonesHumansHydrogen PeroxideMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesNeuronsp300-CBP-Associated FactorCycloheximideDactinomycinE2F1 Transcription FactorE2F2 Transcription FactorH2AX protein, humanHistonesHydrogen PeroxideMAP Kinase Kinase Kinasesp300-CBP-Associated Factorp300-CBP Transcription FactorsProtein Synthesis InhibitorsRad51 RecombinaseASCAT, CAT antisenseASE2F1, E2F1 antisenseASE2F2, E2F2 antisenseDNA damage responseDNA repairE2F transcription factorgenomic stabilitymut E2F DO, mutant E2F decoy oligodeoxynucleotideNCS, neocarzinostatinneuronal cellsODN, oligodeoxynucleotidewt E2F DO, wild-type E2F decoy oligodeoxynucleotide

Identifiers

PMID25892555
PMCPMC4614399
OpenAlexW1990891138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.