Observational studyPatient education and counseling2015
Socio-psychological factors in the Expanded Health Belief Model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening.
Observational study in Patient education and counseling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00786747 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Tailored Interactive Multimedia to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Trial of Tailored Interactive Multimedia to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women in the Rural US: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer: Genetic Risk, Surveillance Strategies, and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Factors affecting compliance with pancreas surveillance in patients with familial/genetic risk.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Health Belief Model in Predicting Screening Behavior among Population at Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Psychological determinants of the effectiveness of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation in overweight and obese women-a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Psychosocial Impact of Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in High-Risk Individuals.Cancers · 2023Article
- Examining Psychological and Knowledge Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Appalachian Kentucky.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Gynaecological Cancers in India: The Less Heard Perspectives of Healthcare Providers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme in Southern Iraq: Challenges, Knowledge Gaps and Future Potential.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Mediators of screening uptake in a colorectal cancer screening intervention among Hispanics.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Validity of a questionnaire on self-efficacy for Pap test adherence screening.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A Multilevel Approach to Understand the Context and Potential Solutions for Low Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Rates in Rural Appalachia Clinics.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021Article
- Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Southern Khorasan (Iran).Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021Article
- Colorectal cancer screening behaviors.PeerJ · 2021Article
- The health belief model and colorectal cancer screening in the general population: A systematic review.Preventive medicine reports · 2020Review
- Psychosocial Barriers to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake: The Roles of Heterosexual Self-Presentation, Sexual Risk, and Perceived Peer PrEP Use.Psychology of men & masculinity · 2020Article
- Factors Associated with Reported Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Lao-American Immigrants in Minnesota.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2020Article
- Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Thais in the U.S.Journal of community health · 2019Article
- Likelihood of a fecal occult blood test uptake among older adults: comparisons between health professionals and healthcare volunteers based on the health belief model.BMC geriatrics · 2019Article
- The role of perceived benefits and barriers in colorectal cancer screening in intervention trials among African Americans.Health education research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCRC screening interventions tailored to the Expanded Health Belief Model (EHBM) socio-psychological factors have been developed, but the contributions of individual factors to screening outcomes are unclear.
methodsIn observational analyses of data from a randomized intervention trial, we examined the independent associations of five EHBM factors - CRC screening knowledge, self-efficacy, stage of readiness, barriers, and discussion with a provider - with objectively measured CRC screening after one year.
resultsWhen all five factors were added simultaneously to a base model including other patient and visit characteristics, three of the factors were associated with CRC screening: self-efficacy (OR=1.32, p=0.001), readiness (OR=2.72, p<0.001), and discussion of screening with a provider (OR=1.59, p=0.009). Knowledge and barriers were not independently associated with screening. Adding the five socio-psychological factors to the base model improved prediction of CRC screening (area under the curve) by 7.7%.
conclusionPatient CRC screening self-efficacy, readiness, and discussion with a provider each independently predicted subsequent screening. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Self-efficacy and readiness measures might be helpful in parsimoniously predicting which patients are most likely to engage in CRC screening. The importance of screening discussion with a provider suggests the potential value of augmenting patient-focused EHBM-tailored interventions with provider-focused elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.