Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25892361›Full record

ReviewProgress in retinal and eye research2015

Fixation strategies for retinal immunohistochemistry.

Tyler W Stradleigh, Andrew T Ishida

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in retinal and eye research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tyler W StradleighDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Andrew T IshidaDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. Electronic address: atishida@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CORE GRANTP30EY012576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LISA M OAKES · 1999 to 2026
$18.9M
PHARMACOLOGY &PHYSIOLOGY OF RETINAL GANGLION CELLSR01EY008120 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI ISHIDA, ANDREW T · 1995 to 2017
$6.7M
Vision Science Training Program: Cornea to CortexT32EY015387 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MARIE E BURNS · 2003 to 2026
$4.8M
PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF RETINAL GANGLION CELLSR29EY008120 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI ISHIDA, ANDREW T · 1989 to 1993
–
NEI NIH HHS EY008120NEI NIH HHS EY008120-17S1NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012576NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008120NEI NIH HHS T32 EY015387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunohistochemical and ex vivo anatomical studies have provided many glimpses of the variety, distribution, and signaling components of vertebrate retinal neurons. The beauty of numerous images published to date, and the qualitative and quantitative information they provide, indicate that these approaches are fundamentally useful. However, obtaining these images entailed tissue handling and exposure to chemical solutions that differ from normal extracellular fluid in composition, temperature, and osmolarity. Because the differences are large enough to alter intercellular and intracellular signaling in neurons, and because retinae are susceptible to crush, shear, and fray, it is natural to wonder if immunohistochemical and anatomical methods disturb or damage the cells they are designed to examine. Tissue fixation is typically incorporated to guard against this damage and is therefore critically important to the quality and significance of the harvested data. Here, we describe mechanisms of fixation; advantages and disadvantages of using formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde as fixatives during immunohistochemistry; and modifications of widely used protocols that have recently been found to improve cell shape preservation and immunostaining patterns, especially in proximal retinal neurons.

Indexed as

FixativesFormaldehydeHumansImmunohistochemistryOsmolar ConcentrationRetinaRetinal NeuronsStaining and LabelingTissue FixationFixativesFormaldehydeAntigen retrievalFixativesFormaldehydeGlutaraldehydepHQuenchingRetinaSucrose

Identifiers

PMID25892361
PMCPMC4543575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.