Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25892211›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2015

Ramping single unit activity in the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum reflects the onset of waiting but not imminent impulsive actions.

Nicholas A Donnelly, Ole Paulsen, Trevor W Robbins, Jeffrey W Dalley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Temporal order judgment of multisensory stimuli in rat and human.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Ramping activity in the striatum.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A sex-dependent role for the prelimbic cortex in impulsive action both before and following early cocaine abstinence.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neural circuitry and mechanisms of waiting impulsivity: relevance to addiction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Coordinated Ramping of Dorsal Striatal Pathways preceding Food Approach and Consumption.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Rodent Medial Frontal Control of Temporal Processing in the Dorsomedial Striatum.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas A DonnellyBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ole PaulsenBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Trevor W RobbinsBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jeffrey W DalleyBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G0701500Medical Research Council G1000183Wellcome Trust 093875Wellcome Trust 093875/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and ventral striatum (VS), including the nucleus accumbens, are key forebrain regions involved in regulating behaviour for future rewards. Dysfunction of these regions can result in impulsivity, characterized by actions that are mistimed and executed without due consideration of their consequences. Here we recorded the activity of single neurons in the mPFC and VS of 16 rats during performance on a five-choice serial reaction time task of sustained visual attention and impulsivity. Impulsive responses were assessed by the number of premature responses made before target stimuli were presented. We found that the majority of cells signalled trial outcome after an action was made (both rewarded and unrewarded). Positive and negative ramping activity was a feature of population activity in the mPFC and VS (49.5 and 50.4% of cells, respectively). This delay-related activity increased at the same rate and reached the same maximum (or minimum) for trials terminated by either correct or premature responses. However, on premature trials, the ramping activity started earlier and coincided with shorter latencies to begin waiting. For all trial types the pattern of ramping activity was unchanged when the pre-stimulus delay period was made variable. Thus, premature responses may result from a failure in the timing of the initiation of a waiting process, combined with a reduced reliance on external sensory cues, rather than a primary failure in delay activity. Our findings further show that the neural locus of this aberrant timing signal may emanate from structures outside the mPFC and VS.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsArea Under CurveChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantImpulsive BehaviorLinear ModelsMaleMicroelectrodesNeuronsPrefrontal CortexPrincipal Component AnalysisRatsReaction TimeVentral Striatumimpulsivityneurophysiologynucleus accumbensratvisual attention

Identifiers

PMID25892211
PMCPMC4529742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.