Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25892065›Full record

ReviewAnalytica chimica acta2015

Protein adsorption onto nanomaterials for the development of biosensors and analytical devices: a review.

Samir A Bhakta, Elizabeth Evans, Tomás E Benavidez, Carlos D Garcia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytica chimica acta, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Protein Adsorption Kinetics on Silica: Theoretical Modeling and Experiments.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Fluorescent optotracers for bacterial and biofilm detection and diagnostics.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mechanism of Myoglobin Molecule Adsorption on Silica: QCM, OWLS and AFM Investigations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samir A BhaktaDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Elizabeth EvansDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Tomás E BenavidezDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Carlos D GarciaDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA. Electronic address: carlos.garcia@utsa.edu.

Funding

RCMI Center for Interdiscplinary Health Research CIHRG12MD007591 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI PERRY, GEORGE · 2012 to 2016
$10.4M
UNDERSTANDING THE INTERACTION OF ANKYRINS AND NANOMATERIALSSC3GM081085 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI GARCIA, CARLOS DIEGO · 2007 to 2015
$844k
NIGMS NIH HHS 2SC3GM081085NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM081085NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007591NIMHD NIH HHS G12MD007591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important consideration for the development of biosensors is the adsorption of the biorecognition element to the surface of a substrate. As the first step in the immobilization process, adsorption affects most immobilization routes and much attention is given into the research of this process to maximize the overall activity of the biosensor. The use of nanomaterials, specifically nanoparticles and nanostructured films, offers advantageous properties that can be fine-tuned to maximize interactions with specific proteins to maximize activity, minimize structural changes, and enhance the catalytic step. In the biosensor field, protein-nanomaterial interactions are an emerging trend that span across many disciplines. This review addresses recent publications about the proteins most frequently used, their most relevant characteristics, and the conditions required to adsorb them to nanomaterials. When relevant and available, subsequent analytical figures of merits are discussed for selected biosensors. The general trend amongst the research papers allows concluding that the use of nanomaterials has already provided significant improvements in the analytical performance of many biosensors and that this research field will continue to grow.

Indexed as

AdsorptionBiosensing TechniquesModels, MolecularNanostructuresProteinsStatic ElectricitySurface PropertiesProteinsAdsorptionBiosensorsNanomaterialsOxidaseProteins

Identifiers

PMID25892065
PMCPMC4405630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.