Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25892017›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2015

Evaluation of Postural Control in Patients with Glaucoma Using a Virtual Reality Environment.

Alberto Diniz-Filho, Erwin R Boer, Carolina P B Gracitelli, Ricardo Y Abe, Nienke van Driel, Zhiyong Yang, Felipe A Medeiros

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Is home perimetry possible?]Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Wayfinding and Glaucoma: A Virtual Reality Experiment.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2017
    Article
  9. The Association of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss and Balance.Translational vision science & technology · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alberto Diniz-FilhoVisual Performance Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Erwin R BoerVisual Performance Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Carolina P B GracitelliVisual Performance Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo Y AbeVisual Performance Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Nienke van DrielDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Zhiyong YangVisual Performance Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Felipe A MedeirosVisual Performance Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: fmedeiros@ucsd.edu.
University of California, San Diego · USDelft University of Technology · NLUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Derek Stuart Welsbie · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): Functional ImpairmentR01EY021818 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MEDEIROS, FELIPE · 2011 to 2015
$3.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY021818NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS P30EY022589NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate postural control using a dynamic virtual reality environment and the relationship between postural metrics and history of falls in patients with glaucoma.

designCross-sectional study.

participantsThe study involved 42 patients with glaucoma with repeatable visual field defects on standard automated perimetry (SAP) and 38 control healthy subjects.

methodsPatients underwent evaluation of postural stability by a force platform during presentation of static and dynamic visual stimuli on stereoscopic head-mounted goggles. The dynamic visual stimuli presented rotational and translational ecologically valid peripheral background perturbations. Postural stability was also tested in a completely dark field to assess somatosensory and vestibular contributions to postural control. History of falls was evaluated by a standard questionnaire.

main outcome measuresTorque moments around the center of foot pressure on the force platform were measured, and the standard deviations of the torque moments (STD) were calculated as a measurement of postural stability and reported in Newton meters (Nm). The association with history of falls was investigated using Poisson regression models. Age, gender, body mass index, severity of visual field defect, best-corrected visual acuity, and STD on dark field condition were included as confounding factors.

resultsPatients with glaucoma had larger overall STD than controls during both translational (5.12 ± 2.39 Nm vs. 3.85 ± 1.82 Nm, respectively; P = 0.005) and rotational stimuli (5.60 ± 3.82 Nm vs. 3.93 ± 2.07 Nm, respectively; P = 0.022). Postural metrics obtained during dynamic visual stimuli performed better in explaining history of falls compared with those obtained in static and dark field condition. In the multivariable model, STD values in the mediolateral direction during translational stimulus were significantly associated with a history of falls in patients with glaucoma (incidence rate ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.63; P = 0.001).

conclusionsThe study presented and validated a novel paradigm for evaluation of balance control in patients with glaucoma on the basis of the assessment of postural reactivity to dynamic visual stimuli using a virtual reality environment. The newly developed metrics were associated with a history of falls and may help to provide a better understanding of balance control in patients with glaucoma.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationUser-Computer InterfaceAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostural BalancePostureProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25892017
PMCPMC4446143
OpenAlexW2148024967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.