Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25891525›Full record

ArticleToxicology2015

Amelioration strategies fail to prevent tobacco smoke effects on neurodifferentiation: Nicotinic receptor blockade, antioxidants, methyl donors.

Theodore A Slotkin, Samantha Skavicus, Jennifer Card, Edward D Levin, Frederic J Seidler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Theodore A SlotkinDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: t.slotkin@duke.edu.
Samantha SkavicusDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Jennifer CardDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Edward D LevinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Frederic J SeidlerDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Duke University Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

Project 3: Epigenomic Consequences of Early Life Environmental Tobacco Smoke P01ES022831 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, SUSAN KAY · 2013 to 2018
$4.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES022831NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES022831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tobacco smoke exposure is associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. We used neuronotypic PC12 cells to evaluate the mechanisms by which tobacco smoke extract (TSE) affects neurodifferentiation. In undifferentiated cells, TSE impaired DNA synthesis and cell numbers to a much greater extent than nicotine alone; TSE also impaired cell viability to a small extent. In differentiating cells, TSE enhanced cell growth at the expense of cell numbers and promoted emergence of the dopaminergic phenotype. Nicotinic receptor blockade with mecamylamine was ineffective in preventing the adverse effects of TSE and actually enhanced the effect of TSE on the dopamine phenotype. A mixture of antioxidants (vitamin C, vitamin E, N-acetyl-l-cysteine) provided partial protection against cell loss but also promoted loss of the cholinergic phenotype in response to TSE. Notably, the antioxidants themselves altered neurodifferentiation, reducing cell numbers and promoting the cholinergic phenotype at the expense of the dopaminergic phenotype, an effect that was most prominent for N-acetyl-l-cysteine. Treatment with methyl donors (vitamin B12, folic acid, choline) had no protectant effect and actually enhanced the cell loss evoked by TSE; they did have a minor, synergistic interaction with antioxidants protecting against TSE effects on growth. Thus, components of tobacco smoke perturb neurodifferentiation through mechanisms that cannot be attributed to the individual effects of nicotine, oxidative stress or interference with one-carbon metabolism. Consequently, attempted amelioration strategies may be partially effective at best, or, as seen here, can actually aggravate injury by interfering with normal developmental signals and/or by sensitizing cells to TSE effects on neurodifferentiation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsCell ProliferationCell SizeCell SurvivalCholinergic NeuronsCytoprotectionDNA ReplicationDopaminergic NeuronsDrug SynergismNeurogenesisNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsNicotineNicotinic AntagonistsPC12 CellsAntioxidantsNeuroprotective AgentsNicotineNicotinic AntagonistsSmokeAntioxidantsMethyl donorsNeurodifferentiationNicotinePC12 cellsTobacco smoke extract

Identifiers

PMID25891525
PMCPMC4466202
OpenAlexW2124789865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.