Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25891231›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2015

Predictors of the nicotine reinforcement threshold, compensation, and elasticity of demand in a rodent model of nicotine reduction policy.

Patricia E Grebenstein, Danielle Burroughs, Samuel A Roiko, Paul R Pentel, Mark G LeSage

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nicotine Reduction in Cigarettes: Literature Review and Gap Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Mouth-Level Nicotine Intake Estimates from Discarded Filter Butts to Examine Compensatory Smoking in Low Nicotine Cigarettes.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stimulus functions of nicotine.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Research on Behavioral Discrimination of Nicotine May Inform FDA Policy on Setting a Maximum Nicotine Content in Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Heroin and saccharin demand and preference in rats.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2017
    Article
  19. Animal Research on Nicotine Reduction: Current Evidence and Research Gaps.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia E GrebensteinDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55415, United States; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Danielle BurroughsDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55415, United States.
Samuel A RoikoDepartment of Neuroscience, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, 183 University Ave E, Saint Paul, MN 55101, United States.
Paul R PentelDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55415, United States; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States; Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, 6-120 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Mark G LeSageDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55415, United States; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, N218 Elliot Hall, 75 E River Rd., Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: lesag002@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USGillette Children's Specialty Healthcare · USOrthopaedic Research Foundation · US

Funding

Determinants of Nicotine Reinforcement Thresholds and Demand Elasticity in RatsR01DA026444 · NIDA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LESAGE, MARK G · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026444PHS HHS R01-026444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe FDA is considering reducing the nicotine content in tobacco products as a population-based strategy to reduce tobacco addiction. Research is needed to determine the threshold level of nicotine needed to maintain smoking and the extent of compensatory smoking that could occur during nicotine reduction. Sources of variability in these measures across sub-populations also need to be identified so that policies can take into account the risks and benefits of nicotine reduction in vulnerable populations.

methodsThe present study examined these issues in a rodent nicotine self-administration model of nicotine reduction policy to characterize individual differences in nicotine reinforcement thresholds, degree of compensation, and elasticity of demand during progressive reduction of the unit nicotine dose. The ability of individual differences in baseline nicotine intake and nicotine pharmacokinetics to predict responses to dose reduction was also examined.

resultsConsiderable variability in the reinforcement threshold, compensation, and elasticity of demand was evident. High baseline nicotine intake was not correlated with the reinforcement threshold, but predicted less compensation and less elastic demand. Higher nicotine clearance predicted low reinforcement thresholds, greater compensation, and less elastic demand. Less elastic demand also predicted lower reinforcement thresholds.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that baseline nicotine intake, nicotine clearance, and the essential value of nicotine (i.e. elasticity of demand) moderate the effects of progressive nicotine reduction in rats and warrant further study in humans. They also suggest that smokers with fast nicotine metabolism may be more vulnerable to the risks of nicotine reduction.

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, OperantDose-Response Relationship, DrugExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleIndividualityMaleNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPredictive Value of TestsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReinforcement, PsychologySelf AdministrationTobacco Use DisorderNicotineNicotinic AgonistsBehavioral economicsNicotine self-administrationPharmacokineticsRatReinforcement thresholdTobacco control policy

Identifiers

PMID25891231
PMCPMC4447604
OpenAlexW1983749706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.