ArticleActa neurochirurgica1989
Sequential changes of auditory brain stem responses in relation to intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure and initiation of secondary brain stem damage.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure in relation to neuropsychological outcome.Intensive care medicine · 1998Article
- The combined monitoring of brain stem auditory evoked potentials and intracranial pressure in coma. A study of 57 patients.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 1992Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship of supratentorial intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CCP) with serial changes in auditory evoked brain stem responses was investigated. Eighty-one patients without primary brain stem damage admitted to our emergency unit were studied. When ICP over 50 mm Hg persisted for 4 hours, the I-V interpeak latency was significantly prolonged. The threshold of this prolongation was 8 hours for the ICP over 45 mm Hg and 24 hours for that of over 40 mm Hg. The ICP of 35-40 mm Hg for 24 hours was the border zone. CCP did not show a significant relation with I-V interpeak latency changes. The loss of wave V was observed in a wide range of the ICP (30-147 mm Hg) and CPP (0-60 mm Hg). Wave III disappeared when the ICP exceeded 50 mm Hg. Wave I became undetectable with an ICP above 50 mm Hg or a CPP below 40 mm Hg. These results indicate that an increase of ICP over 40 mm Hg definitely initiates secondary brainstem dysfunction if it lasts for more than 24 hours and that the ICP should be reduced below this level, preferably below 35 mm Hg, to maintain brain function. The fact that both low CPP and high ICP were involved in the loss of wave I clearly shows that both ischaemia and displacement of the brain stem are the important pathophysiological factors for the disappearance of wave I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.