ArticleBiomaterials2015
The interaction of carbon nanotubes with an in vitro blood-brain barrier model and mouse brain in vivo.
Article in Biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 213 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering combination nanomedicines to overcome cancer resistance.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Feature-Guided Machine Learning for Studying Passive Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability to Aid Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Safety and Potential Neuromodulatory Effects of Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes in Vertebrate and Invertebrate Animal Models In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Advances in research on biomaterials and stem cell/exosome-based strategies in the treatment of traumatic brain injury.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Role of Galangin for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: Journey So Far and Road Ahead.Current nutrition reports · 2025Review
- Advances in Alzheimer's disease control approaches via carbon nanotubes.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Cutting-edge Approach of Carbon Nanostructures: Targeted Drug Delivery to Central Nervous System.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Effects of Halloysite Nanotubes and Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes on Kruppel-like Factor 15-Mediated Downstream Events in Mouse Hearts After Intravenous Injection.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2024Article
- Novel Biomaterials Based Strategies for Neurodegeneration: Recent Advancements and Future Prospects.Current drug delivery · 2024Review
- Nanomaterials as drug delivery agents for overcoming the blood-brain barrier: A comprehensive review.ADMET & DMPK · 2024Review
- Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Materials as Xenobiotics in Living Systems: Is There a Consensus on Their Safety?Journal of xenobiotics · 2023Review
- Adverse Effects of Non-Metallic Nanoparticles in the Central Nervous System.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- In Situ Detection of Neuroinflammation using Multi-cellular 3D Neurovascular Unit-on-a-Chip.Advanced functional materials · 2023Article
- Functionalised Carbon Nanotubes: Promising Drug Delivery Vehicles for Neurovascular Disorder Intervention.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2023Review
- The Role of Biological Rhythms in New Drug Formulations to Cross the Brain Barriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- Mechanical nanosurgery of chemoresistant glioblastoma using magnetically controlled carbon nanotubes.Science advances · 2023Article
- Transnasal targeted delivery of therapeutics in central nervous system diseases: a narrative review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Emerging Novel Approaches for the Enhanced Delivery of Natural Products for the Management of Neurodegenerative Diseases.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2022Review
- Dodging blood brain barrier with "nano" warriors: Novel strategy against ischemic stroke.Theranostics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are a novel nanocarriers with interesting physical and chemical properties. Here we investigate the ability of amino-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs-NH3(+)) to cross the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) in vitro using a co-culture BBB model comprising primary porcine brain endothelial cells (PBEC) and primary rat astrocytes, and in vivo following a systemic administration of radiolabelled f-MWNTs. Transmission Electron microscopy (TEM) confirmed that MWNTs-NH3(+) crossed the PBEC monolayer via energy-dependent transcytosis. MWNTs-NH3(+) were observed within endocytic vesicles and multi-vesicular bodies after 4 and 24 h. A complete crossing of the in vitro BBB model was observed after 48 h, which was further confirmed by the presence of MWNTs-NH3(+) within the astrocytes. MWNT-NH3(+) that crossed the PBEC layer was quantitatively assessed using radioactive tracers. A maximum transport of 13.0 ± 1.1% after 72 h was achieved using the co-culture model. f-MWNT exhibited significant brain uptake (1.1 ± 0.3% injected dose/g) at 5 min after intravenous injection in mice, after whole body perfusion with heparinized saline. Capillary depletion confirmed presence of f-MWNT in both brain capillaries and parenchyma fractions. These results could pave the way for use of CNTs as nanocarriers for delivery of drugs and biologics to the brain, after systemic administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.