Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25890715›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2015

Acellular bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds support functional tissue regeneration in a rat model of onlay esophagoplasty.

Khalid Algarrahi, Debra Franck, Chiara E Ghezzi, Vivian Cristofaro, Xuehui Yang, Maryrose P Sullivan, Yeun Goo Chung, Saif Affas, Russell Jennings, David L Kaplan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical progress and prospects of biodegradable intestinal stents.American journal of translational research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Three-Dimensional Humanized Model of the Periodontal Gingival Pocket to Study Oral Microbiome.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. ACS omega · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Khalid AlgarrahiUrological Diseases Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Debra FranckUrological Diseases Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Chiara E GhezziDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Vivian CristofaroDepartment of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Division of Urology, Veterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA 02132, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Xuehui YangUrological Diseases Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Maryrose P SullivanDepartment of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Division of Urology, Veterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA 02132, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Yeun Goo ChungUrological Diseases Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Saif AffasUrological Diseases Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Russell JenningsDepartment of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Carlos R EstradaUrological Diseases Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: carlos.estrada@childrens.harvard.edu.
Joshua R MauneyUrological Diseases Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: joshua.mauney@childrens.harvard.edu.
Boston Children's Hospital · USTufts University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Translational Bioreactors - Engineering Complex TissuesP41EB002520 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2004 to 2018
$16.7M
Effect of Type II Diabetes on Bladder FunctionI01BX001790 · VA · VA BOSTON HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI MARYROSE P SULLIVAN · 2013 to 2026
–
BLRD VA I01 BX001790NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical management of long-gap esophageal defects with autologous gastrointestinal tissues is frequently associated with adverse complications including organ dysmotility, dysphagia, and donor site morbidity. In order to develop alternative graft options, bi-layer silk fibroin (SF) scaffolds were investigated for their potential to support functional tissue regeneration in a rodent model of esophageal repair. Onlay esophagoplasty was performed with SF matrices (N = 40) in adult rats for up to 2 m of implantation. Parallel groups consisted of animals implanted with small intestinal submucosa (SIS) scaffolds (N = 22) or sham controls receiving esophagotomy alone (N = 20). Sham controls exhibited a 100% survival rate while rats implanted with SF and SIS scaffolds displayed respective survival rates of 93% and 91% prior to scheduled euthanasia. Animals in each experimental group were capable of solid food consumption following a 3 d post-op liquid diet and demonstrated similar degrees of weight gain throughout the study period. End-point μ-computed tomography at 2 m post-op revealed no evidence of contrast extravasation, fistulas, strictures, or diverticula in any of the implant groups. Ex vivo tissue bath studies demonstrated that reconstructed esophageal conduits supported by both SF and SIS scaffolds displayed contractile responses to carbachol, KCl and electrical field stimulation while isoproterenol produced tissue relaxation. Histological (Masson's trichrome and hematoxylin and eosin) and immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluations demonstrated both implant groups produced de novo formation of skeletal and smooth muscle bundles positive for contractile protein expression [fast myosin heavy chain (MY32) and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)] within the graft site. However, SF matrices promoted a significant 4-fold increase in MY32+ skeletal muscle and a 2-fold gain in α-SMA+ smooth muscle in comparison to the SIS cohort as determined by histomorphometric analyses. A stratified squamous, keratinized epithelium expressing cytokeratin 5 and involucrin proteins was also present at 2 m post-op in all experimental groups. De novo innervation and vascularization were evident in all regenerated tissues indicated by the presence of synaptophysin (SYP38)+ boutons and vessels lined with CD31 expressing endothelial cells. In respect to SIS, the SF group supported a significant 4-fold increase in the density of SYP38+ boutons within the implant region. Evaluation of host tissue responses revealed that SIS matrices elicited chronic inflammatory reactions and severe fibrosis throughout the neotissues, in contrast to SF scaffolds. The results of this study demonstrate that bi-layer SF scaffolds represent promising biomaterials for onlay esophagoplasty, capable of producing superior regenerative outcomes in comparison to conventional SIS scaffolds.

Indexed as

RegenerationTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsEsophagoplastyFemaleFibroinsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySilkX-Ray MicrotomographyFibroinsSilkEpitheliumMuscleScaffoldSilkWound healing

Identifiers

PMID25890715
PMCPMC4405663
OpenAlexW1995686224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.