Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25890390›Full record

ReviewCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2015

Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception.

Jonathan E Peelle, Mitchell S Sommers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Infants and Adults Use Visual Cues to Improve Detection and Discrimination of Speech in Noise.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Theta Oscillations as a Bridge between Perception and Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. The rhythm of sensory input shapes audio-visual temporal processing.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Distinct Cortical Populations Drive Multisensory Modulation of Segregated Auditory Sources.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Understanding discourse in face-to-face settings: The impact of multimodal cues and listening conditions.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Integration of audiovisual speech perception: From infancy to older adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan E PeelleDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: peellej@ent.wustl.edu.
Mitchell S SommersDepartment of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

AUDITORY-VISUAL INTEGRATION AND AGER01AG018029 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TYE-MURRAY, NANCY ANN · 2000 to 2015
$4.5M
Age, Hearing Loss, and Sentence Comprehension: Neural CorrelatesR01AG038490 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GROSSMAN, MURRAY · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG018029NIA NIH HHS R01AG018029NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038490NIA NIH HHS R01AG038490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During face-to-face conversational speech listeners must efficiently process a rapid and complex stream of multisensory information. Visual speech can serve as a critical complement to auditory information because it provides cues to both the timing of the incoming acoustic signal (the amplitude envelope, influencing attention and perceptual sensitivity) and its content (place and manner of articulation, constraining lexical selection). Here we review behavioral and neurophysiological evidence regarding listeners' use of visual speech information. Multisensory integration of audiovisual speech cues improves recognition accuracy, particularly for speech in noise. Even when speech is intelligible based solely on auditory information, adding visual information may reduce the cognitive demands placed on listeners through increasing the precision of prediction. Electrophysiological studies demonstrate that oscillatory cortical entrainment to speech in auditory cortex is enhanced when visual speech is present, increasing sensitivity to important acoustic cues. Neuroimaging studies also suggest increased activity in auditory cortex when congruent visual information is available, but additionally emphasize the involvement of heteromodal regions of posterior superior temporal sulcus as playing a role in integrative processing. We interpret these findings in a framework of temporally-focused lexical competition in which visual speech information affects auditory processing to increase sensitivity to acoustic information through an early integration mechanism, and a late integration stage that incorporates specific information about a speaker's articulators to constrain the number of possible candidates in a spoken utterance. Ultimately it is words compatible with both auditory and visual information that most strongly determine successful speech perception during everyday listening. Thus, audiovisual speech perception is accomplished through multiple stages of integration, supported by distinct neuroanatomical mechanisms.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalAuditory PerceptionHumansSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionAudiovisual speechMultisensory integrationPredictive codingPredictive timingSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID25890390
PMCPMC4475441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.