Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25890341›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2015

Mentoring the next generation of physician-scientists in Japan: a cross-sectional survey of mentees in six academic medical centers.

Ken Sakushima, Hiroki Mishina, Shunichi Fukuhara, Kenei Sada, Junji Koizumi, Takashi Sugioka, Naoto Kobayashi, Masaharu Nishimura, Junichiro Mori, Hirofumi Makino and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Med Students SOAR: A Model for Immersive Oncology Research Training for Early Medical Trainees.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ken SakushimaHokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. sakusima@med.hokudai.ac.jp.
Hiroki MishinaDepartment of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Sapporo, Japan. hiroki.mishina@gmail.com.
Shunichi FukuharaDepartment of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University School of Public and Health Center for Innovative Research for Community and Clinical Excellence, Kyoto, Japan. fukuhara.shunichi.6m@kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Kenei SadaDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan. sadakenn@md.okayama-u.ac.jp.
Junji KoizumiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan. koizuj@med.m.kanazawa-u.ac.jp.
Takashi SugiokaSaga University Community Medical Support Institute, Saga, Japan. sugioka@cc.saga-u.ac.jp.
Naoto KobayashiEhime University Medical Education Center, Toon, Japan. naoto@m.ehime-u.ac.jp.
Masaharu NishimuraDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. ma-nishi@med.hokudai.ac.jp.
Junichiro MoriDepartment of Medical Education, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan. jimori@shinshu-u.ac.jp.
Hirofumi MakinoDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan. makino@md.okayama-u.ac.jp.
Mitchell D FeldmanDepartment of Medicine and Associate Vice Provost for Faculty Mentoring at the University of California, 1545 Divisadero, Suite 315, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0320, USA. Mitchell.Feldman@ucsf.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysician-scientists play key roles in biomedical research across the globe, yet prior studies have found that it is increasingly difficult to recruit and retain physician-scientists in research careers. Access to quality research mentorship may help to ameliorate this problem in the U.S., but there is virtually no information on mentoring in academic medicine in Japan. We conducted a survey to determine the availability and quality of mentoring relationships for trainee physician-scientists in Japan.

methodsWe surveyed 1700 physician-scientists in post-graduate research training programs in 6 academic medical centers in Japan about mentorship characteristics, mentee perceptions of the mentoring relationship, and attitudes about career development.

resultsA total of 683 potential physician-scientist mentees completed the survey. Most reported that they had a departmental mentor (91%) with whom they met at least once a month; 48% reported that they were very satisfied with the mentoring available to them. Mentoring pairs were usually initiated by the mentor (85% of the time); respondents identified translational research skills (55%) and grant writing (50%) as unmet needs. Mentoring concerning long-term career planning was significantly associated with the intention to pursue research careers, however this was also identified by some mentees as an unmet need (35% desired assistance; 15% reported receiving it).

conclusionsMore emphasis and formal training in career mentorship may help to support Japanese physician-scientist mentees to develop a sense of self-efficacy to pursue and stay in research careers.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceMentorsAcademic Medical CentersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, ContinuingFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsJapanMaleTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID25890341
PMCPMC4373037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.