Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25890326›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2015

Perceptions and beliefs of public policymakers in a Southern European city.

Joana Morrison, Mariona Pons-Vigués, Elia Díez, Maria Isabel Pasarin, Sergio Salas-Nicás, Carme Borrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Implementation of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool: a Case of Matsapha, Swaziland.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2018
    Article
  7. The Experience of Implementing Urban HEART Barcelona: a Tool for Action.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joana MorrisonDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. j.morrison@ucl.ac.uk.
Mariona Pons-ViguésInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain. mponsv@idiapjgol.info.
Elia DíezCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. ediez@aspb.cat.
Maria Isabel PasarinCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. mpasarin@aspb.cat.
Sergio Salas-NicásAgència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. sergi_salas@hotmail.com.
Carme BorrellCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. cborrell@aspb.cat.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocio-economic inequalities in health are large in urban areas; however, local municipal governments may plan, manage and provide services and policies which can reduce these. The objective of this study was to describe the beliefs and perceptions of public policymakers in a European city, Barcelona. They are the key actors in designing and implementing urban public policies.

methodsA qualitative research study describing policymakers' beliefs on health inequalities. The study population were twelve policymakers. These were politicians or officers from the city council. Informant profiles were selected using a theoretical sample. Semi-structured individual interviews were performed to collect the data and a thematic content analysis was carried out.

resultsPoliticians were aware of health inequalities in their city and identified diverse social causes. They viewed reducing inequalities as a priority for the city's government. Officers were less knowledgeable and described less efforts in addressing health inequalities. It was stated by some that reducing inequalities in non-health sectors helped to reduce health inequalities indirectly and there was some collaboration between two sectors. The most frequent barriers encountered when implementing policies were funding and the cities' limited authority.

conclusionsOfficers and policymakers had different levels of awareness and access to information on health and its social determinants. Officers referred to specific causes of health inequalities and policies which related to their sectors and politicians were more familiar with upstream determinants and policies. Some participants explained that policies and programmes needed to be evaluated and very little intersectoral action was said to be carried out. More efforts should be made to provide all policymakers with information on the social determinants of health inequalities. Research on health inequalities and policy should engage with policymakers and promote health as a cross cutting issue in the city council in liaison with the third sector.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthPerceptionPoliticsHealth PolicyHumansLocal GovernmentQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsSpain

Identifiers

PMID25890326
PMCPMC4343064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.