Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25890315›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2015

Superparamagnetic core/shell GoldMag nanoparticles: size-, concentration- and time-dependent cellular nanotoxicity on human umbilical vein endothelial cells and the suitable conditions for magnetic resonance imaging.

Mingfu Gong, Hua Yang, Song Zhang, Yan Yang, Dong Zhang, Yueyong Qi, Liguang Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Microstructure and Antibacterial Properties of Chitosan-FeNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Cytotoxicity studies of FeRoyal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mingfu GongDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. hummer198625@163.com.
Hua YangDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. cqxqyyyh@163.com.
Song ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. cqxqyyzs@163.com.
Yan YangDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. cqxqyyyy@163.com.
Dong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. cqxqyyzd@163.com.
Yueyong QiDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. cqxqyyqyy@163.com.
Liguang ZouDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. cqxqyyzlg@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGoldMag nanoparticles (GMNPs) possess the properties of colloid gold and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, which make them useful for delivery, separation and molecular imaging. However, because of the nanometer effect, GMNPs are highly toxic. Thus, the biosafety of GMNPs should be fully studied prior to their use in biomedicine. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the nanotoxicity of GMNPs on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and determine a suitable size, concentration and time for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

resultsTransmission electron microscopy showed that GMNPs had a typical shell/core structure, and the shell was confirmed to be gold using energy dispersive spectrometer analysis. The average sizes of the 30 and 50 nm GMNPs were 30.65 ± 3.15 and 49.23 ± 5.01 nm, respectively, and the shell thickness were 6.8 ± 0.65 and 8.5 ± 1.36 nm, respectively. Dynamic light scattering showed that the hydrodynamic diameter of the 30 and 50 nm GMNPs were 33.2 ± 2.68 and 53.12 ± 4.56 nm, respectively. The r 2 relaxivity of the 50 nm GMNPs was 98.65 mM(-1) s(-1), whereas it was 80.18 mM(-1) s(-1) for the 30 nm GMNPs. The proliferation, cytoskeleton, migration, tube formation, apoptosis and ROS generation of labeled HUVECs depended on the size and concentration of GMNPs and the time of exposure. Because of the higher labeling rate, the 50 nm GMNPs exhibited a significant increase in nanotoxicity compared with the 30 nm GMNPs at the same concentration and time. At no more than 25 μg/mL and 12 hours, the 50 nm GMNPs exhibited no significant nanotoxicity in HUVECs, whereas no toxicity was observed at 50 μg/mL and 24 hours for the 30 nm GMNPs.

conclusionsThese results demonstrated that the nanotoxicity of GMNPs in HUVECs depended on size, concentration and time. Exposure to larger GMNPs with a higher concentration for a longer period of time resulted in a higher labeling rate and ROS level for HUVECs. Coupled with r 2 relaxivity, it was suggested that the 50 nm GMNPs are more suitable for HUVEC labeling and MRI, and the suitable concentration and time were 25 μg/mL and 12 hours.

Indexed as

Magnetite NanoparticlesApoptosisCell MovementCell ProliferationDextransDose-Response Relationship, DrugGoldHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagneticsMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNeovascularization, PhysiologicParticle SizeReactive Oxygen SpeciesDextransferumoxidesGoldMagnetite NanoparticlesReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID25890315
PMCPMC4387586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.