Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25890273›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2015

Effects of 7.5% carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation and ethnicity on face memory.

Angela S Attwood, Jon C Catling, Alex S F Kwong, Marcus R Munafò

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Social Interaction Anxiety in Developmental Prosopagnosia: Prevalence, Severity, and Individual Differences.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela S AttwoodMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) at the University of Bristol, United Kingdom; UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bristol, United Kingdom; School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, United Kingdom. Electronic address: angela.attwood@bristol.ac.uk.
Jon C CatlingSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Alex S F KwongMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) at the University of Bristol, United Kingdom; UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bristol, United Kingdom; School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Marcus R MunafòMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) at the University of Bristol, United Kingdom; UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bristol, United Kingdom; School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to accurately verify facial identity has important forensic implications, but this ability is fallible. Research suggests that anxiety at the time of encoding can impair subsequent recall, but no studies have investigated the effects of anxiety at the time of recall in an experimental paradigm. This study addresses this gap using the carbon dioxide (CO2) model of anxiety induction. Thirty participants completed two inhalations: one of 7.5% CO2-enriched air and one of medical air (i.e., placebo). Prior to each inhalation, participants were presented with 16 facial images (50% own-ethnicity, 50% other-ethnicity). During the inhalation they were required to identify which faces had been seen before from a set of 32 images (16 seen-before and 16 novel images). Identification accuracy was lower during CO2 inhalation compared to air (F[1,29]=5.5, p=.026, ηp(2)=.16), and false alarm rate was higher for other-ethnicity faces compared to own-ethnicity faces (F[1,29]=11.3, p=.002, ηp(2)=.28). There was no evidence of gas by ethnicity interactions for accuracy or false alarms (ps>.34). Ratings of decision confidence did not differ by gas condition, suggesting that participants were unaware of differences in performance. These findings suggest that anxiety, at the point of recognition, impairs facial identification accuracy. This has substantial implications for eyewitness memory situations, and suggests that efforts should be made to attenuate the anxiety in these situations in order to improve the validity of identification.

Indexed as

FaceAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceCarbon DioxideConfidence IntervalsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMemoryPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesCarbon Dioxide7.5% CO(2)AnxietyEyewitness memoryFace recognitionOther-ethnicity effect

Identifiers

PMID25890273
PMCPMC4465959
OpenAlexW2119708468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.