Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25890136›Full record

ReviewProgress in brain research2015

Targeted neuroplasticity for rehabilitation.

Aiko K Thompson, Jonathan R Wolpaw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Relationship Between Spinal Reflexes and Spastic Movement Disorders.Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  2. Brain-computer interface: an update for the clinicians.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Operant up-conditioning of the soleus cutaneous reflex to non-noxious stimuli in a person with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Retraining Reflexes: Clinical Translation of Spinal Reflex Operant Conditioning.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aiko K ThompsonDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Helen Hayes Hospital, NYS Department of Health, West Haverstraw, NY, USA.
Jonathan R WolpawNational Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, NYS Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA. Electronic address: jonathan.wolpaw@health.ny.gov.

Funding

Subproject Title: Clinical Research Education, Mentoring and Career Development CoreU54GM104941 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI Gregory E Hicks · 2013 to 2026
$60.5M
Training and DisseminationP41EB018783 · NIBIB · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI Jonathan Rickel Wolpaw · 2014 to 2026
$15.4M
GENERAL PURPOSE BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE(BCI)SYSTEMR01EB000856 · NIBIB · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI SCHALK, GERWIN, WOLPAW, JONATHAN RICKEL · 2002 to 2012
$9.3M
ADAPTIVE PLASTICITY IN THE SPINAL STRETCH REFLEXR01NS022189 · NINDS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI WOLPAW, JONATHAN RICKEL · 1985 to 2012
$3.1M
Changing a Reflex to Improve LocomotionR01NS069551 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI THOMPSON, AIKO · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
Spinal Reflex Conditioning and LocomotionR01NS061823 · NINDS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI CHEN, XIANG YANG, WOLPAW, JONATHAN RICKEL · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
Operant Conditioning of Spinal Reflexes to Improve Function after Nerve InjuryI01BX002550 · VA · STRATTON VETERANS ADMIN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WOLPAW, JONATHAN RICKEL · 2014 to 2017
–
BLRD VA I01 BX002550NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB018783NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000856NIGMS NIH HHS GM104941NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104941NINDS NIH HHS NS022189NINDS NIH HHS NS061823NINDS NIH HHS NS069551NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS022189NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS061823NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS069551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An operant-conditioning protocol that bases reward on the electromyographic response produced by a specific CNS pathway can change that pathway. For example, in both animals and people, an operant-conditioning protocol can increase or decrease the spinal stretch reflex or its electrical analog, the H-reflex. Reflex change is associated with plasticity in the pathway of the reflex as well as elsewhere in the spinal cord and brain. Because these pathways serve many different behaviors, the plasticity produced by this conditioning can change other behaviors. Thus, in animals or people with partial spinal cord injuries, appropriate reflex conditioning can improve locomotion. Furthermore, in people with spinal cord injuries, appropriate reflex conditioning can trigger widespread beneficial plasticity. This wider plasticity appears to reflect an iterative process through which the multiple behaviors in the individual's repertoire negotiate the properties of the spinal neurons and synapses that they all use. Operant-conditioning protocols are a promising new therapeutic method that could complement other rehabilitation methods and enhance functional recovery. Their successful use requires strict adherence to appropriately designed procedures, as well as close attention to accommodating and engaging the individual subject in the conditioning process.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantAnimalsH-ReflexHumansNeuronal PlasticityRecovery of FunctionReflex, StretchSpinal Cord Injuriesactivity-dependent plasticityH-reflexoperant conditioningrehabilitationspinal cord injuryspinal reflex

Identifiers

PMID25890136
PMCPMC4906441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.