Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25890038›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

Knockdown resistance of Anopheles sinensis in Henan province, China.

Hong-wei Zhang, Ying Liu, Tao Hu, Rui-min Zhou, Jian-she Chen, Dan Qian, Cheng-yun Yang, Yu-ling Zhao, Su-hua Li, Jing Cui and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hong-wei ZhangDepartment of Parasite Disease Control and Prevention, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, 450016, P. R. China. Zhwei69@163.com.
Ying LiuDepartment of Parasite Disease Control and Prevention, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, 450016, P. R. China. 14872209@qq.com.
Tao HuSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, P. R. China. walnut1221@163.com.
Rui-min ZhouDepartment of Parasite Disease Control and Prevention, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, 450016, P. R. China. zrm920@126.com.
Jian-she ChenDepartment of Parasite Disease Control and Prevention, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, 450016, P. R. China. chenjs@hncdc.com.cn.
Dan QianDepartment of Parasite Disease Control and Prevention, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, 450016, P. R. China. qianyangdan1983@163.com.
Cheng-yun YangDepartment of Parasite Disease Control and Prevention, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, 450016, P. R. China. tochyun@163.com.
Yu-ling ZhaoDepartment of Parasite Disease Control and Prevention, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, 450016, P. R. China. 819482937@qq.com.
Su-hua LiDepartment of Parasite Disease Control and Prevention, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, 450016, P. R. China. lsh0427@163.com.
Jing CuiDepartment of Parasitology, Medical College, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, P. R. China. cuij@zzu.edu.cn.
Zhong-quan WangDepartment of Parasitology, Medical College, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, P. R. China. wangzq@zzu.edu.cn.
Zhanchun FengSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, P. R. China. zcfeng@mail.tjmu.edu.cn.
Bian-li XuDepartment of Parasite Disease Control and Prevention, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, 450016, P. R. China. Bianlixu@163.com.
Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVivax malaria was historically epidemic in Henan Province of China and Anopheles sinensis was the main vectors and poor farming communities bare the greatest burden of disease. Knockdown resistance in An. sinensis is one of the mechanisms of resistance against pyrethroids. In the present study, the frequency of mutations from An. sinensis was examined in Henan province, China.

methodsAnopheles was collected from Kaifeng, Tongbai, Tanghe, Pingqiao, Shihe, and Yongcheng counties of Henan province in 2013. Molecular identification of Anopheles species was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifying the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2). Part of the IIS6 domain of the para-type sodium channel protein gene was polymerase chain reaction-amplified and directly sequenced. Frequency and geographic difference of kdr gene mutant types were analysed.

results208 Anopheles were received molecular identification, of which 169 (81.25%) were An. sinensis, 25 (12.02%) were Anopheles yatsushiroensis, and 12 (5.77%) were Anopheles lesteri. A 325 bp fragment of the para-type sodium channel gene including position 1014 was successfully sequenced from 139 Anopheles, of which 125 (89.93%) were An. sinensis, 12 (8.63%) were An. yatsushiroensis, 2 (1.44%) were An. lesteri. The molecular analyses revealed that mutations existed at codon 1014 in An. sinensis but not in An. yatsushiroensis and An. lesteri. Frequency of kdr mutation was 73.60% (92/125) from population of An. sinensis in Henan province, of which L1014F (TTT + TTC) allele frequencies accounted for 46.40% (58/125), and was higher than that of L1014C(TGT) which accounted for 27.20% (34/125) ( χ2 = 55.423, P < 0.001). The frequency of kdr mutation in Kaifeng county was 100% (49/49), and was higher than that of 37.93% (11/29) in Tongbai, 54.55% (6/11) in Pingqiao, 50.00% (3/3) in Shihe, and 62.50% (10/16) in Yongcheng county, respectively (χ2 = 39.538, P < 0.001; χ2 = 24.298, P < 0.001; χ2 = 25.913, P < 0.001; χ2 = 20.244, P < 0.001). While 92.86% (13/14) frequency of kdr mutation was found in Tanghe county, which was higher than that in Tongbai county (χ2 = 11.550, P = 0.0018).

conclusionsA high frequency of kdr gene mutations from population of An. sinensis in Henan province was found.

Indexed as

Insecticide ResistanceAnimalsAnophelesChinaDNA, Ribosomal SpacerGene FrequencyGeographyInsecticidesInsect VectorsMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionPyrethrinsSequence Analysis, DNASodium ChannelsDNA, Ribosomal SpacerInsecticidesPyrethrinsSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID25890038
PMCPMC4381423
OpenAlexW1981812902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.