Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25890026›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2015

Women doctors and their careers in a large university hospital in Spain at the beginning of the 21st century.

Pilar Arrizabalaga, Rosa Abellana, Odette Viñas, Anna Merino, Carlos Ascaso

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pilar ArrizabalagaNephrology and Transplant Department, ICNU, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain. parriza@clinic.ub.es.
Rosa AbellanaBiomedical Investigation Institute August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. rabellana@ub.edu.
Odette ViñasImmunology Department, CDB, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain. ovinyas@clinic.ub.es.
Anna MerinoBiomedical Investigation Institute August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. amerino@clinic.ub.es.
Carlos AscasoBiomedical Investigation Institute August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. carlosascaso@ub.edu.
Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe feminization of medicine has risen dramatically over the past decades. The aim of this article was to compare the advance of women with that of men and determine the differences between hierarchical status and professional recognition achieved by women in medicine.

methodsA retrospective study was carried out in the Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Spain, of the period from 1996 to 2008. Data relating to temporary and permanent positions, hierarchy and career promotion achieved, specialty, age and the sex of the participants were analysed with the ANOVA test and logistic regression using the generalized estimated equation.

resultsAfter completion of specialist training, fewer women than men doctors obtained permanent positions. The ratios between the proportions of women and men remained 1.2 for permanent non-hierarchal medical positions and below 0.2 for higher hierarchal levels. Fewer women than men with hierarchy and fewer women than men achieved the rank of consultant. Promotion to consultant and senior consultant was lower than that to senior specialist, being higher in specialties with gender parity and in masculinised specialties. On comparing the two genders using a statistical model, the probability of continuous promotion decreased with the year of the application and the age of the applicant, except in women.

conclusionsDespite the number of women training as specialists having increased to 50%, women remained in temporary positions twofold longer than men. Compared to women, men showed significant representation in hierarchal medical positions, and women showed a lower adjusted probability of internal professional promotion throughout the study period.

Indexed as

Career MobilityEmploymentHospitals, UniversityWomen's RightsFemaleGender IdentityHumansMalePhysicians, WomenReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSpainSpecializationWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID25890026
PMCPMC4415310
OpenAlexW2054232564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.