ArticleMalaria journal2015
Mosquito host preferences affect their response to synthetic and natural odour blends.
Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Impact of peri-urban pig farms on mosquito community structure in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025Article
- The spatial heterogeneity of malaria transmission: An entomological investigation in a highly endemic setting of Burkina Faso.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025Article
- The MTego trap: a potential tool for monitoring malaria and arbovirus vectors.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Mosquito Attractants.Journal of chemical ecology · 2021Review
- Optimisation and field validation of odour-baited traps for surveillance of Aedes aegypti adults in Paramaribo, Suriname.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
- Attraction of mosquitoes to primate odours and implications for zoonotic Plasmodium transmission.Medical and veterinary entomology · 2020Article
- Probe-based multiplex qPCR identifies blood-meal hosts in Anopheles mosquitoes from Papua New Guinea.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
- Controlling mosquitoes with semiochemicals: a review.Parasites & vectors · 2020Review
- Passive Outdoor Host Seeking Device (POHD): Designing and Evaluation against Outdoor Biting Malaria Vectors.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2020Article
- Semifield Evaluation of Improved Passive Outdoor Host Seeking Device (POHD) for Outdoor Control ofTheScientificWorldJournal · 2020Article
- Article
- Does artemether-lumefantrine administration affect mosquito olfactory behaviour and fitness?Malaria journal · 2019Article
- Spatial and temporal development of deltamethrin resistance in malaria vectors of the Anopheles gambiae complex from North Cameroon.PloS one · 2019Article
- Unexpectedly high Plasmodium sporozoite rate associated with low human blood index in Anopheles coluzzii from a LLIN-protected village in Burkina Faso.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Impact of partially and fully closed eaves on house entry rates by mosquitoes.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
- Olfaction, experience and neural mechanisms underlying mosquito host preference.The Journal of experimental biology · 2018Review
- Field evaluation of the BG-Malaria trap for monitoring malaria vectors in rural Tanzanian villages.PloS one · 2018Article
- Semi-field assessment of the BG-Malaria trap for monitoring the African malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis.PloS one · 2017Article
- Chicken volatiles repel host-seeking malaria mosquitoes.Malaria journal · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe anthropophilic malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (hereafter termed Anopheles gambiae) primarily takes blood meals from humans, whereas its close sibling Anopheles arabiensis is more opportunistic. Previous studies have identified several compounds that play a critical role in the odour-mediated behaviour of An. gambiae. This study determined the effect of natural and synthetic odour blends on mosquitoes with different host preferences to better understand the host-seeking behaviour of mosquitoes and the potential of synthetic odour blends for standardized monitoring.
methodsOdour blends were initially tested for their attractiveness to An. gambiae and An. arabiensis in a semi-field system with MM-X traps baited with natural and synthetic odours. Natural host odours were collected from humans, cows and chickens. The synthetic odour blends consisted of three or five previously identified compounds released with carbon dioxide. These studies were continued under natural conditions where odour blends were tested outdoors to determine their effect on species with different host preferences.
resultsIn the semi-field experiments, human odour attracted significantly higher numbers of both mosquito species. However, An. arabiensis was also attracted to cow and chicken odours, which confirms its opportunistic behaviour. A five-component synthetic blend was highly attractive to both mosquito species. In the field, the synthetic odour blend caught significantly more An. funestus than traps baited with human odour, while no difference was found for An. arabiensis. Catches of An. arabiensis and Culex spp. contained large numbers of blood-fed mosquitoes, mostly from cows, which indicates that these mosquitoes had fed outdoors.
conclusionsDifferent odour baits elicit varying responses among mosquito species. Synthetic odour blends are highly effective for trapping mosquitoes; however, not all mosquitoes respond equally to the same odour blend. Combining fermenting molasses with synthetic blends in a trap represents the most effective tool to catch blood-fed mosquitoes outside houses, which is essential for understanding outdoor malaria transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.