ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2015
Assessment of health-related quality of life using the SF-36 in Chinese cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients after surgery and its consistency with neurological function assessment: a cohort study.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- SF36 Is a Reliable Patient-Oriented Outcome Evaluation Tool in Surgically Treated Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Cases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Sagittal vertical axis, spinosacral angle, T1 pelvic angle, and spinopelvic angle: which parameters can predict improvement in quality of life after surgical correction of ankylosing spondylitis?Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Network analysis of symptoms related to quality of life and subjective well-being during pregnancy.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Which PROM Should Be Used to Address the Right Domain of Interest After ACL-R: A Comprehensive Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Review
- The impact of elective spine surgery in Canada for degenerative conditions on patient reported health-related quality of life outcomes.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Examining symptom and quality of life in polycystic ovarian syndrome: a web-based cross-sectional study.Future science OA · 2024Article
- The effects of a physical exercise program in Chinese kidney transplant recipients: a prospective randomised controlled trial.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
- Change in Physical and Mental Quality-of-Life between the Short- and Mid-Term Periods after Cervical Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Minimum 5 Years Follow-up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Caregiver burden and associated factors among primary caregivers of patients with ALS in home care: a cross-sectional survey study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire as an outcome measure for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament patients in East Asia: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Predictors for quality of life improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a prospective multi-center study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Article
- Predictors associated with neurological recovery after anterior decompression with fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in mainland China: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Article
- What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2020Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life of Medical Students in a Chinese University: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Two-level cervical corpectomy-long-term follow-up reveals the high rate of material failure in patients, who received an anterior approach only.Neurosurgical review · 2019Article
- Minimum clinically important difference in outcome scores among patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019Article
- High-resolution magnetization transfer MRI in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2018Article
- Changes in quality of life after elective surgery: an observational study comparing two measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to calculate the responsiveness and statistically prove the reliability of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in a prospective cohort study. We investigated the profile of mid-term health-related quality of life (QOL) outcome assessments after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and determined the consistency of the SF-36 assessments of neurological function.
methodsA total of 142 consecutive patients with CSM who underwent surgery were enrolled in the study. QOL and neurological assessments were evaluated before and at 3 months, 1 year, and more than 2 years postoperatively. We subsequently analyzed the reliability and responsiveness of the SF-36 and the QOL profile for its consistency regarding the neurological function assessment.
results(1) Cronbach's α ranged from 0.73 (for role-emotional) to 0.85 (for physical function). The effect size ranged from 0.57 to 0.93 for SF-36's eight scales. Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) in the physical scores (PCS) and mental scores (MCS) were 5.52 and 3.43, respectively. (2) The scores for all SF-36 scale sections indicated that patients with CSM were significantly impaired compared with healthy adults. SF-36 PCS and MCS peaked at 17.7 and 18.9 months after surgery, respectively. (3) At 3 months after surgery, improvements in the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores significantly correlated only with patients' physical function and bodily pain scores. At 1 year after surgery, improvements in the mJOA scores significantly correlated with physical function, general health, social function, and role-emotional. At the final follow-up, improvements in the mJOA scores significantly correlated with physical function, vitality, and role-emotional.
conclusionsSF-36 is reliable and has moderate responsiveness for evaluating patients with CSM, with MCID at 5.52 for the PCS and at 3.43 for the MCS. The preoperative QOL of the CSM patients was severely impaired compared with that of the normal population. Postoperatively, each SF-36 domain improved to a variable degree. During the early stage of recovery the mJOA score improvements correlated with SF-36's physical component domains, whereas during the later stages the improvements were associated with the mental component domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.