ArticleMicrobial cell factories2015
Isobutanol production from cellobionic acid in Escherichia coli.
Article in Microbial cell factories, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbial host engineering for sustainable isobutanol production from renewable resources.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Cellobionate production from sodium hydroxide pretreated wheat straw by engineered Neurospora crassa HL10.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2024Article
- EngineeringMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Synthesis of isobutanol using acetate as sole carbon source in Escherichia coli.Microbial cell factories · 2023Article
- Bioproduction and applications of aldobionic acids with a focus on maltobionic and cellobionic acid.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2023Review
- Microbial engineering for the production of isobutanol: current status and future directions.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of isobutanol: a review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Review
- Cellulosic biofuel production using emulsified simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (eSSF) with conventional and thermotolerant yeasts.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2021Article
- Modulating redox metabolism to improve isobutanol production in Shimwellia blattae.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2021Article
- Homoethanol Production from Glycerol and Gluconate Using RecombinantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Efficient production of sugar-derived aldonic acids byRSC advances · 2018Article
- Enhancement of photosynthetic isobutanol production in engineered cells ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2018Article
- Isobutanol production inMetabolic engineering communications · 2017Article
- Exploiting Self-organization in Bioengineered Systems: A Computational Approach.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2017Article
- Converting Sugars to Biofuels: Ethanol and Beyond.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Crystal Structure and Substrate Recognition of Cellobionic Acid Phosphorylase, Which Plays a Key Role in Oxidative Cellulose Degradation by Microbes.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
- Cellobionic acid utilization: from Neurospora crassa to Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiquid fuels needed for the global transportation industry can be produced from sugars derived from plant-based lignocellulosics. Lignocellulosics contain a range of sugars, only some of which (such as cellulose) have been shown to be utilizable by microorganisms capable of producing biofuels. Cellobionic acid makes up a small but significant portion of lignocellulosic degradation products, and had not previously been investigated as an utilizable substrate. However, aldonic acids such as cellobionic acid are the primary products of a promising new group of lignocellulosic-degrading enzymes, which makes this compound group worthy of study. Cellobionic acid doesn't inhibit cellulose degradation enzymes and so its inclusion would increase lignocellulosic degradation efficiency. Also, its use would increase overall product yield from lignocellulose substrate. For these reasons, cellobionic acid has gained increased attention for cellulosic biofuel production.
resultsThis study describes the discovery that Escherichia coli are naturally able to utilize cellobionic acid as a sole carbon source with efficiency comparable to that of glucose and the construction of an E. coli strain able to produce the drop-in biofuel candidate isobutanol from cellobionic acid. The gene primarily responsible for growth of E. coli on cellobionic acid is ascB, a gene previously thought to be cryptic (expressed only after incurring specific mutations in nearby regulatory genes). In addition to AscB, the ascB knockout strain can be complemented by the cellobionic acid phosphorylase from the fungus Neurospora crassa. An E. coli strain engineered to express the isobutanol production pathway was successfully able to convert cellobionic acid into isobutanol. Furthermore, to demonstrate potential application of this strain in a sequential two-step bioprocessing system, E. coli was grown on hydrolysate (that was degraded by a fungus) and was successfully able to produce isobutanol.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate that cellobionic acid is a viable carbon source for biofuel production. This work suggests that with further optimization, a bacteria-fungus co-culture could be used in decreased-cost biomass-based biofuel production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.