Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889729›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2015

Isobutanol production from cellobionic acid in Escherichia coli.

Shuchi H Desai, Christine A Rabinovitch-Deere, Zhiliang Fan, Shota Atsumi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. EngineeringMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Homoethanol Production from Glycerol and Gluconate Using RecombinantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Isobutanol production inMetabolic engineering communications · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Converting Sugars to Biofuels: Ethanol and Beyond.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuchi H DesaiDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. shddesai@ucdavis.edu.
Christine A Rabinovitch-DeereDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. carabinovitch@ucdavis.edu.
Zhiliang FanMicrobiology Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. jzfan@ucdavis.edu.
Shota AtsumiDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. satsumi@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiquid fuels needed for the global transportation industry can be produced from sugars derived from plant-based lignocellulosics. Lignocellulosics contain a range of sugars, only some of which (such as cellulose) have been shown to be utilizable by microorganisms capable of producing biofuels. Cellobionic acid makes up a small but significant portion of lignocellulosic degradation products, and had not previously been investigated as an utilizable substrate. However, aldonic acids such as cellobionic acid are the primary products of a promising new group of lignocellulosic-degrading enzymes, which makes this compound group worthy of study. Cellobionic acid doesn't inhibit cellulose degradation enzymes and so its inclusion would increase lignocellulosic degradation efficiency. Also, its use would increase overall product yield from lignocellulose substrate. For these reasons, cellobionic acid has gained increased attention for cellulosic biofuel production.

resultsThis study describes the discovery that Escherichia coli are naturally able to utilize cellobionic acid as a sole carbon source with efficiency comparable to that of glucose and the construction of an E. coli strain able to produce the drop-in biofuel candidate isobutanol from cellobionic acid. The gene primarily responsible for growth of E. coli on cellobionic acid is ascB, a gene previously thought to be cryptic (expressed only after incurring specific mutations in nearby regulatory genes). In addition to AscB, the ascB knockout strain can be complemented by the cellobionic acid phosphorylase from the fungus Neurospora crassa. An E. coli strain engineered to express the isobutanol production pathway was successfully able to convert cellobionic acid into isobutanol. Furthermore, to demonstrate potential application of this strain in a sequential two-step bioprocessing system, E. coli was grown on hydrolysate (that was degraded by a fungus) and was successfully able to produce isobutanol.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that cellobionic acid is a viable carbon source for biofuel production. This work suggests that with further optimization, a bacteria-fungus co-culture could be used in decreased-cost biomass-based biofuel production systems.

Indexed as

Industrial MicrobiologyBiofuelsButanolsCelluloseDisaccharidesEscherichia coliNeurospora crassaBiofuelsButanolscellobionic acidCelluloseDisaccharidesisobutyl alcohol

Identifiers

PMID25889729
PMCPMC4403981
OpenAlexW1983053596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.