Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889713›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2015

Effect of prednisone on type I interferon signature in rheumatoid arthritis: consequences for response prediction to rituximab.

Tamarah D de Jong, Saskia Vosslamber, Marjolein Blits, Gertjan Wolbink, Mike T Nurmohamed, Conny J van der Laken, Gerrit Jansen, Alexandre E Voskuyl, Cornelis L Verweij

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Regulating IRFs in IFN Driven Disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tamarah D de JongDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7075, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. td.dejong@vumc.nl.
Saskia VosslamberDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7075, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.vosslamber@vumc.nl.
Marjolein BlitsDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7075, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.blits@vumc.nl.
Gertjan WolbinkJan van Breemen Institute | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. g.wolbink@reade.nl.
Mike T NurmohamedJan van Breemen Institute | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.nurmohamed@reade.nl.
Conny J van der LakenDepartment of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.vanderlaken@vumc.nl.
Gerrit JansenDepartment of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. g.jansen@vumc.nl.
Alexandre E VoskuylDepartment of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ae.voskuyl@vumc.nl.
Cornelis L VerweijDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7075, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.verweij@vumc.nl.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElevated type I interferon (IFN) response gene (IRG) expression has proven clinical relevance in predicting rituximab non-response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Interference between glucocorticoids (GCs) and type I IFN signaling has been demonstrated in vitro. Since GC use and dose are highly variable among patients before rituximab treatment, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of GC use on IRG expression in relation to rituximab response prediction in RA.

methodsIn two independent cohorts of 32 and 182 biologic-free RA patients and a third cohort of 40 rituximab-starting RA patients, peripheral blood expression of selected IRGs was determined by microarray or quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and an IFN-score was calculated. The baseline IFN-score was tested for its predictive value towards rituximab response in relation to GC use using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis in the rituximab cohort. Patients with a decrease in disease activity score (∆DAS28) >1.2 after 6 months of rituximab were considered responders.

resultsWe consistently observed suppression of IFN-score in prednisone users (PREDN(+)) compared to non-users (PREDN(-)). In the rituximab cohort, analysis on PREDN(-) patients (n = 13) alone revealed improved prediction of rituximab non-response based on baseline IFN-score, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.975 compared to 0.848 in all patients (n = 40). Using a group-specific IFN-score cut-off for all patients and PREDN(-) patients alone, sensitivity increased from 41% to 88%, respectively, combined with 100% specificity.

conclusionsBecause of prednisone-related suppression of IFN-score, higher accuracy of rituximab response prediction was achieved in PREDN(-) patients. These results suggest that the IFN-score-based rituximab response prediction model could be improved upon implementation of prednisone use.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInterferon Type IMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrednisoneRituximabTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsInterferon Type IPrednisoneRituximab

Identifiers

PMID25889713
PMCPMC4416246
OpenAlexW2154500600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.