Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889691›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2015

Analytical platform evaluation for quantification of ERG in prostate cancer using protein and mRNA detection methods.

Jintang He, Athena A Schepmoes, Tujin Shi, Chaochao Wu, Thomas L Fillmore, Yuqian Gao, Richard D Smith, Wei-Jun Qian, Karin D Rodland, Tao Liu and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prostate cancer theragnostics biomarkers: An update.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis Significance of ERG Methylation as a Biomarker in Down's Syndrome.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jintang HeBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. jintang.he@pnnl.gov.
Athena A SchepmoesBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. athena.schepmoes@pnnl.gov.
Tujin ShiBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. tujin.shi@pnnl.gov.
Chaochao WuBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. chaochao.wu@pnnl.gov.
Thomas L FillmoreEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. thomas.fillmore@pnnl.gov.
Yuqian GaoBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. yuqian.gao@pnnl.gov.
Richard D SmithBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. dick.smith@pnnl.gov.
Wei-Jun QianBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. weijun.qian@pnnl.gov.
Karin D RodlandBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. karin.rodland@pnnl.gov.
Tao LiuBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. tao.liu@pnnl.gov.
David G CampBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. dave.camp@pnnl.gov.
Anshu RastogiCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. arastogi@cpdr.org.
Shyh-Han TanCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. stan@cpdr.org.
Wusheng YanCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. wyan@cpdr.org.
Ahmed A MohamedCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. amohamed@cpdr.org.
Wei HuangCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. whuang@cpdr.org.
Sreedatta BanerjeeCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. sbanerjee@cpdr.org.
Jacob KaganCancer Biomarkers Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. kaganj@mail.nih.gov.
Sudhir SrivastavaCancer Biomarkers Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. ss1a@nih.gov.
David G McLeodCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. dgmcleod@verizon.net.
Shiv SrivastavaCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. ssrivastava@cpdr.org.
Gyorgy PetrovicsCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. gpetrovics@cpdr.org.
Albert DobiCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. adobi@cpdr.org.
Alagarsamy SrinivasanCenter for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. asrinivasan@cpdr.org.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USNational Cancer Institute · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

Equipment Supplement Request for a Research Resource for Ultra-sensitive High Throughput ProteomicsP41GM103493 · NIGMS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2012 to 2022
$22.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103493NIGMS NIH HHS P41GM103493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe established methods for detecting prostate cancer (CaP) are based on tests using PSA (blood), PCA3 (urine), and AMACR (tissue) as biomarkers in patient samples. The demonstration of ERG oncoprotein overexpression due to gene fusion in CaP has thus provided ERG as an additional biomarker. Based on this, we hypothesized that ERG protein quantification methods can be of use in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

methodsAn antibody-free assay for ERG3 protein detection was developed based on PRISM (high-pressure high-resolution separations with intelligent selection and multiplexing)-SRM (selected reaction monitoring) mass spectrometry. We utilized TMPRSS2-ERG positive VCaP and TMPRSS2-ERG negative LNCaP cells to simulate three different sample types (cells, tissue, and post-DRE urine sediment). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), western blot, NanoString, and qRT-PCR were also used in the analysis of these samples.

resultsRecombinant ERG3 protein spiked into LNCaP cell lysates could be detected at levels as low as 20 pg by PRISM-SRM analysis. The sensitivity of the PRISM-SRM assay was approximately 10,000 VCaP cells in a mixed cell population model of VCaP and LNCaP cells. Interestingly, ERG protein could be detected in as few as 600 VCaP cells spiked into female urine. The sensitivity of the in-house ELISA was similar to the PRISM-SRM assay, with detection of 30 pg of purified recombinant ERG3 protein and 10,000 VCaP cells. On the other hand, qRT-PCR exhibited a higher sensitivity, as TMPRSS2-ERG transcripts were detected in as few as 100 VCaP cells, in comparison to NanoString methodologies which detected ERG from 10,000 cells.

conclusionsBased on this data, we propose that the detection of both ERG transcriptional products with RNA-based assays, as well as protein products of ERG using PRISM-SRM assays, may be of clinical value in developing diagnostic and prognostic assays for prostate cancer given their sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAmino Acid SequenceBlotting, WesternEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansMaleMass SpectrometryMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesProstatic NeoplasmsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRecombinant ProteinsRNA, MessengerTrans-ActivatorsERG protein, humanPeptidesRecombinant ProteinsRNA, MessengerTrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional Regulator ERG

Identifiers

PMID25889691
PMCPMC4342100
OpenAlexW2112413290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.