Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889588›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

The right to be informed and fear of disclosure: sustainability of a full error disclosure policy at an Italian cancer centre/clinic.

Stefano D'Errico, Sara Pennelli, Antonio Prospero Colasurdo, Paola Frati, Lorella Sicuro, Vittorio Fineschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of Inadequacies in Hospital Care through Medical Liability Litigation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Primary care physicians and oncologists are partners in cancer announcement.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefano D'ErricoASL2 Lucca, Ospedale 'Campo di Marte', edificio O, 55100, Lucca, Italy. stefanoderrico@hotmail.com.
Sara PennelliI.R.C.C.S. Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata, via Padre Pio 1, 85028, Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy. sara.pennelli@crob.it.
Antonio Prospero ColasurdoI.R.C.C.S. Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata, via Padre Pio 1, 85028, Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy. antonio.colasurdo@crob.it.
Paola FratiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00185, Rome, Italy. paola.frati@fastwebnet.it.
Lorella SicuroNational Institute of Statistics ISTAT, AEM Territorial Office for Abruzzo and Molise Regions, Pescara, Italy. sicuro@istat.it.
Vittorio FineschiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00185, Rome, Italy. vfinesc@tin.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the behaviour of physicians in cases of medical error as well as the nature of the information that should be given to the patient and to ascertain whether it is possible to institute a full error disclosure policy. Data was collected through the completion of anonymous questionnaires by medical directors of the IRCCS CROB (the Oncology Centre of Basilicata, Italy).

methodsAn anonymous questionnaire consisting of 15 questions was prepared and administered to all the physicians working at the IRCCS CROB - the Oncology Centre of Basilicata. The main aim of the research was to evaluate the feasibility of adopting a full disclosure policy and the extent to which such a policy could help reduce administration and legal costs.

resultsThe physicians interviewed unanimously recognize the importance of error disclosure, given that they themselves would want to be informed if they were the patients. However, 50% have never disclosed a medical error to their patients. Fear of losing the patient's trust (33%) and fear of lawsuits (31%) are the main obstacles to error disclosure.

conclusionsThe authors found that physicians were in favour of a full policy disclosure at the IRCCS CROB - the Oncology Centre of Basilicata. Many more studies need to be carried out in order to comprehend the economic impact of a full error disclosure policy.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesFearMedical ErrorsTruth DisclosureAdultFemaleHumansItalyLanguageMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesTrust

Identifiers

PMID25889588
PMCPMC4460857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.