Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889533›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Utility of mosquito surveillance data for spatial prioritization of vector control against dengue viruses in three Brazilian cities.

Kim M Pepin, Clint B Leach, Cecilia Marques-Toledo, Karla H Laass, Kelly S Paixao, Angela D Luis, David T S Hayman, Nels G Johnson, Michael G Buhnerkempe, Scott Carver and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kim M PepinFogarty International Center, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA. Kim.M.Pepin@aphis.usda.gov.
Clint B LeachDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA. clint.leach@colostate.edu.
Cecilia Marques-ToledoEcovec S.A, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. cecilia@ecovec.com.
Karla H LaassDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. karlalaass1@yahoo.com.br.
Kelly S PaixaoDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. kellypaixaoufmg@gmail.com.
Angela D LuisFogarty International Center, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA. angela.d.luis@gmail.com.
David T S HaymanDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA. davidtshayman@gmail.com.
Nels G JohnsonDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA. Nels.Johnson@rams.colostate.edu.
Michael G BuhnerkempeDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA. michael.buhnerkempe@gmail.com.
Scott CarverDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA. scott.carver@utas.edu.au.
Daniel A GrearDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA. Daniel.A.Grear@aphis.usda.gov.
Kimberly TsaoDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA. kimtsao@aya.yale.edu.
Alvaro E EirasDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. alvaro@icb.ufmg.br.
Colleen T WebbFogarty International Center, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA. ctwebb@lamar.colostate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVector control remains the primary defense against dengue fever. Its success relies on the assumption that vector density is related to disease transmission. Two operational issues include the amount by which mosquito density should be reduced to minimize transmission and the spatio-temporal allotment of resources needed to reduce mosquito density in a cost-effective manner. Recently, a novel technology, MI-Dengue, was implemented city-wide in several Brazilian cities to provide real-time mosquito surveillance data for spatial prioritization of vector control resources. We sought to understand the role of city-wide mosquito density data in predicting disease incidence in order to provide guidance for prioritization of vector control work.

methodsWe used hierarchical Bayesian regression modeling to examine the role of city-wide vector surveillance data in predicting human cases of dengue fever in space and time. We used four years of weekly surveillance data from Vitoria city, Brazil, to identify the best model structure. We tested effects of vector density, lagged case data and spatial connectivity. We investigated the generality of the best model using an additional year of data from Vitoria and two years of data from other Brazilian cities: Governador Valadares and Sete Lagoas.

resultsWe found that city-wide, neighborhood-level averages of household vector density were a poor predictor of dengue-fever cases in the absence of accounting for interactions with human cases. Effects of city-wide spatial patterns were stronger than within-neighborhood or nearest-neighborhood effects. Readily available proxies of spatial relationships between human cases, such as economic status, population density or between-neighborhood roadway distance, did not explain spatial patterns in cases better than unweighted global effects.

conclusionsFor spatial prioritization of vector controls, city-wide spatial effects should be given more weight than within-neighborhood or nearest-neighborhood connections, in order to minimize city-wide cases of dengue fever. More research is needed to determine which data could best inform city-wide connectivity. Once these data become available, MI-dengue may be even more effective if vector control is spatially prioritized by considering city-wide connectivity between cases together with information on the location of mosquito density and infected mosquitos.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringAnimalsBrazilCitiesDengueDisease Transmission, InfectiousHealth Care RationingHumansModels, StatisticalMosquito ControlSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25889533
PMCPMC4335543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.