Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889490›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2015

Relationship between participants' level of education and engagement in their completion of the Understanding Dementia Massive Open Online Course.

Lynette R Goldberg, Erica Bell, Carolyn King, Ciaran O'Mara, Fran McInerney, Andrew Robinson, James Vickers

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Learning Design Strategies in MOOCs for Physicians' Training: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lynette R GoldbergWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, School of Medicine/Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 143, 7001, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Lyn.Goldberg@utas.edu.au.
Erica BellWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, School of Medicine/Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 143, 7001, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Lyn.Goldberg@utas.edu.au.
Carolyn KingSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 34, 7001, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Carolyn.King@utas.edu.au.
Ciaran O'MaraWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, School of Medicine/Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 143, 7001, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Ciaran.OMara@utas.edu.au.
Fran McInerneyWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, School of Medicine/Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 143, 7001, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Fran.McInerney@utas.edu.au.
Andrew RobinsonWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, School of Medicine/Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 143, 7001, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. andrew.robinson@utas.edu.au.
James VickersWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, School of Medicine/Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 143, 7001, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. james.vickers@utas.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe completion rates for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) generally are low (5-10%) and have been reported to favour participants with higher (typically tertiary-level) education. Despite these factors, the flexible learning offered by a MOOC has the potential to provide an accessible educational environment for a broad spectrum of participants. In this regard, the Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre has developed a MOOC on dementia that is evidence-based and intended to address this emerging major global public health issue by providing educational resources to a broad range of caregivers, people with dementia, and health care professionals.

methodsThe Understanding Dementia MOOC was designed specifically to appeal to, and support, adult learners with a limited educational background. The nine-week course was presented in three units. Participants passed a quiz at the end of each unit to continue through the course. A series of discussion boards facilitated peer-to-peer interactions. A separate "Ask an Expert" discussion board also was established for each unit where participants posted questions and faculty with expertise in the area responded.

resultsAlmost 10,000 people from 65 countries registered; 4,409 registrants engaged in the discussion boards, and 3,624 (38%) completed the course. Participants' level of education ranged from postgraduate study to a primary (elementary) school education. Participants without a university education (vocational certificate and below) were as likely as those with a university education to complete the course (χ(2) = 2.35, df = 6, p = 0.88) and to engage in the online discussions (F[6, 3799] = 0.85, p = 0.54). Further, participants who completed the MOOC engaged in significantly more discussion board posts than participants who did not complete the course (t = 39.60, df = 4407, p <0.001).

conclusionsThe high completion rate and level of engagement of participants across a broad spectrum of levels of education suggest that MOOCs can be successfully developed and delivered to students from diverse educational backgrounds. The high participation rate also highlights the combination of MOOC design as well as the scale of unmet need for quality dementia education.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceAustraliaDementiaEducational MeasurementEducational StatusEducation, DistanceEducation, ProfessionalFemaleHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInternetInterprofessional RelationsMalePatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25889490
PMCPMC4384387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.