Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889489›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2015

Associations between self-reported pest treatments and pesticide concentrations in carpet dust.

Nicole C Deziel, Joanne S Colt, Erin E Kent, Robert B Gunier, Peggy Reynolds, Benjamin Booth, Catherine Metayer, Mary H Ward

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Agricultural and domestic pesticides in house dust from different agricultural areas in France.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Pesticides and Child's Health in France.Current environmental health reports · 2018
    Review
  18. Pesticides in indoor and outdoor residential dust: a pilot study in a rural county of Taiwan.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole C DezielYale School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, 60 College St., New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. nicole.deziel@yale.edu.
Joanne S ColtOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. coltj@mail.nih.gov.
Erin E KentOutcomes Research Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. erin.kent@nih.gov.
Robert B GunierSchool of Public Health, University of California, 50 University Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. gunier@berkeley.edu.
Peggy ReynoldsCancer Prevention Institute of California, 2201 Walnut Ave., Fremont, CA, 94538, USA. Peggy.Reynolds@cpic.org.
Benjamin BoothOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. benjamin.booth@nih.gov.
Catherine MetayerSchool of Public Health, University of California, 50 University Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. cmetayer@berkeley.edu.
Mary H WardOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. wardm@mail.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USCancer Prevention Institute of California · USYale University · US

Funding

Training CoreP42ES004705 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MORELLO-FROSCH, RACHEL ADELE · 1987 to 2025
$74.6M
Cancer Risk and Environmental ExposuresZIACP010125 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI PURDUE, MARK · 2009 to 2025
$41.3M
Environmental and Molecular Epidemiology of Childhood LeukemiaR01ES009137 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI METAYER, CATHERINE · 1999 to 2013
$21.1M
Exposure Insights Using GIS in a Case-Control StudyR01CA092674 · NCI · IMPACT ASSESSMENT, INC. · PI REYNOLDS, PEGGY · 2002 to 2006
$1.6M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS N02 CP011015NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092674NCI NIH HHS R01 CA717450NCI NIH HHS R01 CA92674NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004705NIEHS NIH HHS P42-ES04705NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES009137NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES09137PHS HHS 7590-S-01PHS HHS 7590-S-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent meta-analyses demonstrate an association between self-reported residential pesticide use and childhood leukemia risk. Self-reports may suffer from recall bias and provide information only on broad pesticide categories. We compared parental self-reported home and garden pest treatments to pesticides measured in carpet dust.

methodsParents of 277 children with leukemia and 306 controls in Northern and Central California (2001-2007) were asked about insect and weed treatments during the previous year. Carpet dust samples were analyzed for 47 pesticides. We present results for the 7 insecticides (carbaryl, propoxur, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, permethrin), 5 herbicides (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid [2,4-D], chlorthal, dicamba, mecoprop, simazine), and 1 synergist (piperonyl butoxide) that were present in home and garden products during the study period and were detected in ≥25% of carpet dust samples. We constructed linear regression models for the relative change in pesticide concentrations associated with self-reported treatment of pest types in cases and controls separately and combined, adjusting for demographics, housing characteristics, and nearby agricultural pesticide applications.

resultsSeveral self-reported treatments were associated with pesticide concentrations in dust. For example, households with flea/tick treatments had 2.3 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.4, 3.7) times higher permethrin concentrations than households not reporting this treatment. Households reporting treatment for ants/cockroaches had 2.5 (95% CI: 1.5, 4.2) times higher cypermethrin levels than households not reporting this treatment. Weed treatment by a household member was associated with 1.9 (1.4, 2.6), 2.2 (1.6, 3.1), and 2.8 (2.1, 3.7) times higher dust concentrations of dicamba, mecoprop, and 2,4-D, respectively. Weed treatments by professional applicators were null/inversely associated with herbicide concentrations in dust. Associations were generally similar between cases and controls and were consistent with pesticide active ingredients in these products during the study time period.

conclusionsConsistency between self-reported pest treatments, concentrations in dust, and pesticides in products lends credibility to the exposure assessment methods and suggests that differential recall by case-control status is minimal.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposurePest ControlAdolescentCaliforniaCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolDustFemaleFloors and FloorcoveringsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLeukemiaMalePesticide ResiduesDustPesticide Residues

Identifiers

PMID25889489
PMCPMC4374193
OpenAlexW2082307725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.