Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889402›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2015

Large-scale expansion of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells on gelatin microbeads, with retention of self-renewal and multipotency characteristics and the capacity for enhancing skin wound healing.

Guifang Zhao, Feilin Liu, Shaowei Lan, Pengdong Li, Li Wang, Junna Kou, Xiaojuan Qi, Ruirui Fan, Deshun Hao, Chunling Wu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Status of research on the development and regeneration of hair follicles.International journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Guifang ZhaoDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. Zhaogf13@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
Feilin LiuDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. lfl19920829@163.com.
Shaowei LanDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. lsw.11@163.com.
Pengdong LiDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. lipengdongwww@163.com.
Li WangDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. wangwxl1128@163.com.
Junna KouDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. Koujn13@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
Xiaojuan QiDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. Qixj13@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
Ruirui FanDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. Fanrr13@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
Deshun HaoDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. haods14@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
Chunling WuDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. dlutwcl@163.com.
Tingting BaiDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. xiao_bai_1210@163.com.
Yulin LiDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. ylli@jlu.edu.cn.
Jin Yu LiuDepartment of Pathobiology, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, P.R. China. jy_liu@jlu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSuccessful stem cell therapy relies on large-scale generation of stem cells and their maintenance in a proliferative multipotent state. This study aimed to establish a three-dimension culture system for large-scale generation of hWJ-MSC and investigated the self-renewal activity, genomic stability and multi-lineage differentiation potential of such hWJ-MSC in enhancing skin wound healing.

methodshWJ-MSC were seeded on gelatin microbeads and cultured in spinning bottles (3D). Cell proliferation, karyotype analysis, surface marker expression, multipotent differentiation (adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic potentials), and expression of core transcription factors (OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, and C-MYC), as well as their efficacy in accelerating skin wound healing, were investigated and compared with those of hWJ-MSC derived from plate cultres (2D), using in vivo and in vitro experiments.

resultshWJ-MSC attached to and proliferated on gelatin microbeads in 3D cultures reaching a maximum of 1.1-1.30×10(7) cells on 0.5 g of microbeads by days 8-14; in contrast, hWJ-MSC derived from 2D cultures reached a maximum of 6.5 -11.5×10(5) cells per well in a 24-well plate by days 6-10. hWJ-MSC derived by 3D culture incorporated significantly more EdU (P<0.05) and had a significantly higher proliferation index (P<0.05) than those derived from 2D culture. Immunofluorescence staining, real-time PCR, flow cytometry analysis, and multipotency assays showed that hWJ-MSC derived from 3D culture retained MSC surface markers and multipotency potential similar to 2D culture-derived cells. 3D culture-derived hWJ-MSC also retained the expression of core transcription factors at levels comparable to their 2D culture counterparts. Direct injection of hWJ-MSC derived from 3D or 2D cultures into animals exhibited similar efficacy in enhancing skin wound healing.

conclusionsThus, hWJ-MSC can be expanded markedly in gelatin microbeads, while retaining MSC surface marker expression, multipotent differential potential, and expression of core transcription factors. These cells also efficiently enhanced skin wound healing in vivo, in a manner comparable to that of hWJ-MSC obtained from 2D culture.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationGelatinHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceMicrospheresNanog Homeobox ProteinOctamer Transcription Factor-3Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSkinSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTissue Culture TechniquesGelatinHomeodomain ProteinsMYC protein, humanNanog Homeobox ProteinNANOG protein, humanOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25889402
PMCPMC4413550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.