Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889371›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2015

Decreased Temporomandibular Joint Range of Motion in a Model of Early Osteoarthritis in the Rabbit.

Sarah E Henderson, Mauro A Tudares, Scott Tashman, Alejandro J Almarza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Activation of the VpdmFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah E HendersonGraduate Student Researcher, Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Mauro A TudaresResearch Technician, Department of Oral Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Scott TashmanAssociate Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Alejandro J AlmarzaAssociate Professor, Department of Bioengineering; Department of Oral Biology; and McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: aja19@pitt.edu.

Funding

Training in Biomechanics in Regenerative MedicineT32EB003392 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOO, SAVIO L-Y. · 2005 to 2020
$4.0M
A Regenerative Medicine Approach for TMJ Meniscus RestorationR01DE022055 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ALMARZA, ALEJANDRO JOSE, BADYLAK, STEPHEN F. · 2012 to 2015
$2.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB003392NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnalysis of mandibular biomechanics could help with understanding the mechanisms of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders (TMJDs), such as osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA), by investigating the effects of injury or disease on TMJ movement. The objective of the present study was to determine the functional kinematic implications of mild TMJ-OA degeneration caused by altered occlusion from unilateral splints in the rabbit. MATERIALS AND

methodsAltered occlusion of the TMJ was mechanically induced in rabbits by way of a unilateral molar dental splint (n = 3). TMJ motion was assessed using 3-dimensional (3D) skeletal kinematics twice, once before and once after 6 weeks of splint placement with the splints removed, after allowing 3 days of recovery. The relative motion of the condyle to the fossa and the distance between the incisors were tracked.

resultsAn overall decrease in the range of joint movement was observed at the incisors and in the joint space between the condyle and fossa. The incisor movement decreased from 7.0 ± 0.5 mm to 6.2 ± 0.5 mm right to left, from 5.5 ± 2.2 mm to 4.6 ± 0.8 mm anterior to posterior, and from 13.3 ± 1.8 mm to 11.6 ± 1.4 mm superior to inferior (P < .05). The total magnitude of the maximum distance between the points on the condyle and fossa decreased from 3.6 ± 0.8 mm to 3.1 ± 0.6 mm for the working condyle and 2.8 ± 0.4 mm to 2.5 ± 0.4 mm for the balancing condyle (P < .05). The largest decreases were seen in the anteroposterior direction for both condyles.

conclusionDetermining the changes in condylar movement might lead to a better understanding of the early predictors in the development of TMJ-OA and determining when the symptoms become a chronic, irreversible problem.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalRange of Motion, ArticularAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleOsteoarthritisRabbitsRadiographyTemporomandibular Joint

Identifiers

PMID25889371
PMCPMC4540658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.