Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889354›Full record

Trial reportNutrition journal2015

A randomized, controlled, crossover trial to assess the acute appetitive and metabolic effects of sausage and egg-based convenience breakfast meals in overweight premenopausal women.

Tia M Rains, Heather J Leidy, Kristen D Sanoshy, Andrea L Lawless, Kevin C Maki

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrition journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01713114 (A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial to Assess the Effects of Varying Meals on Satiety), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01713114 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial to Assess the Effects of Varying Meals on Satiety

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hillshire Brands CompanyRan2012Enrolled38ConditionsFocus of the Study is SatietyArmsAcute measures of satiety and food intake at next meal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Metabolic Implications of Diet and Energy Intake during Physical Inactivity.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2019
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tia M RainsSALTT, LLC, 801 Ouilmette Ln, Wilmette, IL, 60091, USA. Tia.Rains@gmail.com.
Heather J LeidyDepartment of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, 307 Gwynn Hall, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA. leidyh@health.missouri.edu.
Kristen D SanoshyBiofortis Clinical Research, 211 E. Lake St, Addison, IL, 60101, USA. kristen.sanoshy@mxns.com.
Andrea L LawlessBiofortis Clinical Research, 211 E. Lake St, Addison, IL, 60101, USA. andrea.lawless@mxns.com.
Kevin C MakiBiofortis Clinical Research, 211 E. Lake St, Addison, IL, 60101, USA. kmaki@mc-mcr.com.
Lake County · USMorthland College · USSanford Research · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary protein at breakfast has been shown to enhance satiety and reduce subsequent energy intake more so than carbohydrate or fat. However, relatively few studies have assessed substitution of protein for carbohydrate on indicators of appetite and glucose homeostasis simultaneously.

methodsThe acute appetitive and metabolic effects of commercially-prepared sausage and egg-based breakfast meals at two different protein levels (30 g and 39 g/serving), vs. a low-protein pancake breakfast (3 g protein) and no breakfast (water), were examined in premenopausal women (N = 35; age 32.5 ± 1.6 yr; BMI 24.8 ± 0.5 kg/m(2)). Test products provided ~280 kcal/serving and similar fat (12-14 g) and fiber contents (0-1 g). Visual Analog Scale ratings for appetite (hunger, fullness, prospective consumption, desire to eat) and repeated blood sampling for plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were assessed throughout each test day. Energy intake was recorded at an ad libitum lunch meal at 240 min.

resultsResults showed increased satiety ratings for both the 30 and 39 g protein meals vs. the low-protein and no breakfast conditions (p < 0.001 for all). Postprandial glucose and insulin excursions were lower following the 30 g and 39 g protein conditions vs. the low-protein condition, with smaller responses following the 39 g vs. 30 g protein condition (p < 0.05 for all). Energy intake at lunch was significantly less (p < 0.001) following the 39 g protein meal (692 kcal) vs. the low-protein and no breakfast conditions (789 and 810 kcal, respectively). Total energy intake from the test condition + lunch was higher (p < 0.01) for the 30 and 39 g meals (982 and 983 kcal, respectively) vs. no breakfast (810 kcal), and less than the low protein breakfast (1064 kcal; p < 0.01 vs. 39 g condition only).

conclusionsResults suggest that convenience meals providing 30 or 39 g protein/serving produce greater appetite control, lower postprandial glycemia and insulinemia, and reduced subsequent intake at lunch relative to a low-protein control, or no breakfast.

trial registrationNCT01713114.

Indexed as

AppetiteBreakfastEnergy IntakeSatiationAdultBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesDietary CarbohydratesDietary ProteinsFemaleHumansInsulinLunchMeat ProductsOverweightOvumBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesDietary ProteinsInsulinWater

Identifiers

PMID25889354
PMCPMC4334852
OpenAlexW2119530359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.