Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889295›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2015

Cohort study of consistency between the compliance with guidelines for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and patient outcome.

Masahiro Inoue, Manabu Shoji, Naomi Shindo, Kazunori Otsuka, Masatomo Miura, Hiroyuki Shibata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Outcomes of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting guideline adherence in pediatric and adult patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Certified nurse specialists in cancer nursing and prophylactic antiemetic prescription for chemotherapy patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Masahiro InoueDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan. minoue@med.akita-u.ac.jp.
Manabu ShojiDivision of Chemotherapy for Outpatient, Akita University, Akita, Japan. m-shoji@hos.akita-u.ac.jp.
Naomi ShindoDivision of Chemotherapy for Outpatient, Akita University, Akita, Japan. shindou.naomi@hos.akita-u.ac.jp.
Kazunori OtsukaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan. kazunori-otsuka@miyagi-pho.jp.
Masatomo MiuraDepartment of Pharmacy, Akita University, Akita, Japan. m-miura@hos.akita-u.ac.jp.
Hiroyuki ShibataDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan. hiroyuki@med.akita-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is one of the most influential factors that affect patient quality of life; thus, preventing this adverse event could lead to better patient outcome. Standard preventive guidelines for antiemetic treatment have already been established based on the emetogenicity of chemotherapeutic agents. It is important that compliance with in-house guidelines and their effect on patient outcome is monitored.

methodsIn 3 years since the Akita university hospital antiemetic guidelines were outlined, we assessed the incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting using the antiemesis tool of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. Compliance of the guidelines was extracted from the hospital clinical record, and the chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting was examined by the patient reported outcome.

resultsSeventy-three patients answered the questionnaire. The overall compliance rate with the guidelines for early nausea and vomiting was 98.6% and with the delayed nausea and vomiting was 87.7%. The complete response rate for the early and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting was 77.8% and 73.8%, respectively. The overall relative risk of early nausea and vomiting was 0.22 (P < 0.05), whereas the relative risk for delayed nausea and vomiting was 2.09 (P < 0.05). Breakthrough vomiting was observed in 3 cases in the low-risk group only. These data suggest that delayed nausea and vomiting is difficult to prevent, particularly in the low-risk group. Further, it seems that the individual sensitivity for emetogenicity might differ among patients.

conclusionsIn addition to standard prevention guidelines based on emetogenicity, individual care based on patient reports should be considered for the complete prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNauseaNeoplasmsTime FactorsVomitingAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25889295
PMCPMC4379596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.