Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889221›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2015

The normative background of empirical-ethical research: first steps towards a transparent and reasoned approach in the selection of an ethical theory.

Sabine Salloch, Sebastian Wäscher, Jochen Vollmann, Jan Schildmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evidence, Emotion and Eminence: A Qualitative and Evaluative Analysis of Doctors' Skills in Macroallocation.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sabine SallochInstitute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, NRW Junior Research Group "Medical Ethics at the End of Life: Norm and Empiricism", Malakowturm - Markstr. 258a, D-44799, Bochum, Germany. Sabine.Salloch-s52@Rub.de.
Sebastian WäscherInstitute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, NRW Junior Research Group "Medical Ethics at the End of Life: Norm and Empiricism", Malakowturm - Markstr. 258a, D-44799, Bochum, Germany. Sebastian.Waescher@Rub.de.
Jochen VollmannInstitute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, NRW Junior Research Group "Medical Ethics at the End of Life: Norm and Empiricism", Malakowturm - Markstr. 258a, D-44799, Bochum, Germany. Jochen.Vollmann@Rub.de.
Jan SchildmannInstitute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, NRW Junior Research Group "Medical Ethics at the End of Life: Norm and Empiricism", Malakowturm - Markstr. 258a, D-44799, Bochum, Germany. Jan.Schildmann@Rub.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpirical-ethical research constitutes a relatively new field which integrates socio-empirical research and normative analysis. As direct inferences from descriptive data to normative conclusions are problematic, an ethical framework is needed to determine the relevance of the empirical data for normative argument. While issues of normative-empirical collaboration and questions of empirical methodology have been widely discussed in the literature, the normative methodology of empirical-ethical research has seldom been addressed. Based on our own research experience, we discuss one aspect of this normative methodology, namely the selection of an ethical theory serving as a background for empirical-ethical research. DISCUSSION: Whereas criteria for a good ethical theory in philosophical ethics are usually related to inherent aspects, such as the theory's clarity or coherence, additional points have to be considered in the field of empirical-ethical research. Three of these additional criteria will be discussed in the article: (a) the adequacy of the ethical theory for the issue at stake, (b) the theory's suitability for the purposes and design of the empirical-ethical research project, and (c) the interrelation between the ethical theory selected and the theoretical backgrounds of the socio-empirical research. Using the example of our own study on the development of interventions which support clinical decision-making in oncology, we will show how the selection of an ethical theory as a normative background for empirical-ethical research can proceed. We will also discuss the limitations of the procedures chosen in our project. The article stresses that a systematic and reasoned approach towards theory selection in empirical-ethical research should be given priority rather than an accidental or implicit way of choosing the normative framework for one's own research. It furthermore shows that the overall design of an empirical-ethical study is a multi-faceted endeavor which has to balance between theoretical and pragmatic considerations.

Indexed as

Empirical ResearchEthical AnalysisEthical TheoryEthics, MedicalResearch DesignClinical Decision-MakingCooperative BehaviorHumansMedical OncologyMorals

Identifiers

PMID25889221
PMCPMC4404235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.