ArticleBMC medical ethics2015
The normative background of empirical-ethical research: first steps towards a transparent and reasoned approach in the selection of an ethical theory.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empirical Bioethics-Historical, Philosophical, and Methodological Perspectives.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Examining Practices Related to Ethical Aspects in eHealth Evaluation Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- AI Ethics beyond Principles: Strengthening the Life-world Perspective.Science and engineering ethics · 2025Article
- Concept of Normativity in Multi-Omics Analysis of Axon Regeneration.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- The Vagueness of Integrating the Empirical and the Normative: Researchers' Views on Doing Empirical Bioethics.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2024Article
- Acceptable objectives of empirical research in bioethics: a qualitative exploration of researchers' views.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Theory and practice of integrative clinical ethics support: a joint experience within gender affirmative care.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing.Life sciences, society and policy · 2020Article
- Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2019Article
- Evidence, Emotion and Eminence: A Qualitative and Evaluative Analysis of Doctors' Skills in Macroallocation.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2019Article
- Illness and disease: an empirical-ethical viewpoint.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- Beyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2018Review
- The use of empirical research in bioethics: a survey of researchers in twelve European countries.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
- What trial participants need to be told about placebo effects to give informed consent: a survey to establish existing knowledge among patients with back pain.Journal of medical ethics · 2017Article
- Using typing techniques in a specific outbreak: the ethical reflection of public health professionals.Epidemiology and infection · 2017Article
- Evidence-based bioethics: delineating the connections between science, practice, and values in medicine.Croatian medical journal · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmpirical-ethical research constitutes a relatively new field which integrates socio-empirical research and normative analysis. As direct inferences from descriptive data to normative conclusions are problematic, an ethical framework is needed to determine the relevance of the empirical data for normative argument. While issues of normative-empirical collaboration and questions of empirical methodology have been widely discussed in the literature, the normative methodology of empirical-ethical research has seldom been addressed. Based on our own research experience, we discuss one aspect of this normative methodology, namely the selection of an ethical theory serving as a background for empirical-ethical research. DISCUSSION: Whereas criteria for a good ethical theory in philosophical ethics are usually related to inherent aspects, such as the theory's clarity or coherence, additional points have to be considered in the field of empirical-ethical research. Three of these additional criteria will be discussed in the article: (a) the adequacy of the ethical theory for the issue at stake, (b) the theory's suitability for the purposes and design of the empirical-ethical research project, and (c) the interrelation between the ethical theory selected and the theoretical backgrounds of the socio-empirical research. Using the example of our own study on the development of interventions which support clinical decision-making in oncology, we will show how the selection of an ethical theory as a normative background for empirical-ethical research can proceed. We will also discuss the limitations of the procedures chosen in our project. The article stresses that a systematic and reasoned approach towards theory selection in empirical-ethical research should be given priority rather than an accidental or implicit way of choosing the normative framework for one's own research. It furthermore shows that the overall design of an empirical-ethical study is a multi-faceted endeavor which has to balance between theoretical and pragmatic considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.