Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889181›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2015

Radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Biao Yang, Rui-yu Zan, Shi-yu Wang, Xiang-lian Li, Mao-ling Wei, Wen-hao Guo, Xin You, Jing Li, Zheng-yin Liao

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Recent progress in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Genetic variants ofCancer management and research · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Biao YangDepartment of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 17 Renming Road, Chengdu, 610000, People's Republic of China. landayb@163.com.
Rui-yu ZanDepartment of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 17 Renming Road, Chengdu, 610000, People's Republic of China. Zanruiyu2012@163.com.
Shi-yu WangDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. 1037457494@qq.Com.
Xiang-lian LiChinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 17 Renming Road, Chengdu, 610000, China. 422253878@qq.com.
Mao-ling WeiChinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 17 Renming Road, Chengdu, 610000, China. maolingwei@hotmail.com.
Wen-hao GuoDepartment of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 17 Renming Road, Chengdu, 610000, People's Republic of China. Bruce212@126.com.
Xin YouDepartment of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 17 Renming Road, Chengdu, 610000, People's Republic of China. Youxin_dm@sina.com.
Jing LiChinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 17 Renming Road, Chengdu, 610000, China. Lijing68@hotmail.com.
Zheng-yin LiaoDepartment of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 17 Renming Road, Chengdu, 610000, People's Republic of China. zhengyinliao@vip.sina.com.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CNShanghai Children's Medical Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) are treatment methods for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not suitable for surgery. Although some reports indicate that RFA is better than PEI, results from previous reviews and analyses are inconsistent. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to more thoroughly evaluate the effects of these treatments in patients with HCC.

methodsA literature search was conducted using the Excerpta Medica dataBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, the Wanfang database, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the Chongqing VIP database without language limitations. The primary outcome evaluated was overall survival, and secondary outcomes included complete response and local recurrence. Comparisons were made between Asian and European studies.

resultsTotal pooled and subgroup analyses of Asian studies that included selection biases revealed that RFA is superior to PEI with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio (HR), 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37 to 0.80; P < 0.01) and complete response (relative risk (RR), 1.10; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.18; P < 0.01). However, no significant difference was observed between RFA and PEI in the European studies. In Asian studies, RFA was associated with a lower local recurrence rate than PEI at 1 year (RR, 0.44; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.95; P < 0.05) and 3 years (RR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.55; P < 0.01). However, local recurrence was significantly lower after only 3 years in European studies (RR, 0.50; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.78; P < 0.05).

conclusionsRFA was only superior to PEI in Asian studies that included selection bias. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to support the idea that RFA is superior to PEI for patients with cirrhotic HCC. Additional large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials that control for selection bias are needed to fully elucidate the optimal treatment method for HCC.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCarcinoma, HepatocellularEthanolHumansInjectionsLiver NeoplasmsPrognosisAnti-Infective Agents, LocalEthanol

Identifiers

PMID25889181
PMCPMC4355988
OpenAlexW2154539628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.