Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889149›Full record

Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2015

CAPIRI-IMRT: a phase II study of concurrent capecitabine and irinotecan with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of recurrent rectal cancer.

Gang Cai, Ji Zhu, Joshua D Palmer, Ye Xu, Weigang Hu, Weilie Gu, Sanjun Cai, Zhen Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gang CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, China. caigangcg@163.com.
Ji ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, China. leo.zhu@126.com.
Joshua D PalmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Joshua.palmer@jeffersonhospital.org.
Ye XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, China. xu.shirley021@gmail.com.
Weigang HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, China. jackhuwg@gmail.com.
Weilie GuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, China. guweilie@hotmail.com.
Sanjun CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, China. drsanjuncai@163.com.
Zhen ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, China. zhenzhang6@yahoo.com.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated the local effect and acute toxicity of irinotecan and capecitabine with concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of recurrent rectal cancer without prior pelvic irradiation.

methodsSeventy-one patients diagnosed with recurrent rectal cancer who did not previously receive pelvic irradiation were treated in our hospital from October 2009 to July 2012. Radiotherapy was delivered to the pelvis, and IMRT of 45 Gy (1.8 Gy per fraction), followed by a boost of 10 Gy to 16 Gy (2 Gy per fraction), was delivered to the recurrent sites. The concurrent chemotherapy regimen was 50 mg/m(2) irinotecan weekly and 625 mg/m(2) capecitabine twice daily (Mon-Fri). Radical surgery was recommended for medically fit patients without extra-pelvic metastases. The patients were followed up every 3 months. Tumor response was evaluated using CT/MRIs according to the RECIST criteria or postoperative pathological findings. NCI-CTC 3.0 was used to score the toxicities.

resultsForty-eight patients (67.6%) had confirmed recurrent rectal cancer without extra pelvic metastases, and 23 patients (32.4%) had extra pelvic metastases. Fourteen patients (19.7%) underwent radical resections (R0) post-chemoradiation. A pathologic complete response was observed in 7 of 14 patients. A clinical complete response was observed in 4 patients (5.6%), and a partial response was observed in 22 patients (31.0%). Only 5 patients (7.0%) showed progressive disease during or shortly after treatment. Of 53 symptomatic patients, clinical complete and partial symptom relief with chemoradiation was achieved in 56.6% and 32.1% of patients, respectively. Only 2 patients (2.8%) experienced grade 4 leukopenia. The most common grade 3 toxicity was diarrhea (16 [22.5%] patients). The median follow-up was 31 months. The cumulative local progression-free survival rate was 74.2% and 33.9% at 1 and 3 years after chemoradiation, respectively. The cumulative total survival rate was 80.1% and 36.5% at 1 and 3 years after chemoradiation, respectively.

conclusionsThis study revealed that concurrent irinotecan and capecitabine with IMRT significantly relieves local symptoms and exhibits promising efficacy with manageable toxicities in recurrent rectal cancer without prior pelvic irradiation. Improving the rate of R0 resections will be investigated in a future study.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdenocarcinomaAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinCapecitabineChemoradiotherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIrinotecanMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalCamptothecinCapecitabineIrinotecan

Identifiers

PMID25889149
PMCPMC4353448
OpenAlexW2160734873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.