Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889099›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2015

Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification.

Bence Somoskoi, Nicola A Martino, Rosa A Cardone, Giovanni M Lacalandra, Maria E Dell'Aquila, Sandor Cseh

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Cryopreservation of Gametes and Embryos and Their Molecular Changes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Abnormal Glucose Metabolism in Male Mice Offspring Conceived byFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bence SomoskoiDepartment and Clinic of Obstetrics and Reproduction, Szent Istvan University, Budapest, Hungary. somoskoibence@gmail.com.
Nicola A MartinoVeterinary Clinics and Animal Productions Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Trasplantation (DETO), University of Bari Aldo Moro Valenzano, Bari, Italy. nicmartino@libero.it.
Rosa A CardoneDepartment of Bioscience, Biotechnology and Pharmacological Science, University of Bari, 70126, Bari, Italy. r.cardone@biologia.uniba.it.
Giovanni M LacalandraVeterinary Clinics and Animal Productions Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Trasplantation (DETO), University of Bari Aldo Moro Valenzano, Bari, Italy. giovannimichele.lacalandra@uniba.it.
Maria E Dell'AquilaDepartment of Bioscience, Biotechnology and Pharmacological Science, University of Bari, 70126, Bari, Italy. mariaelena.dellaquila@uniba.it.
Sandor CsehDepartment and Clinic of Obstetrics and Reproduction, Szent Istvan University, Budapest, Hungary. cseh.sandor@aotk.szie.hu.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITMagyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to cryopreserve mammalian embryos has become an integral part of assisted reproduction, both in human and veterinary medicine. Despite differences in the size and physiological characteristics of embryos from various species, the embryos have been frozen by either of two procedures: slow freezing or vitrification. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of slow freezing and vitrification to the chromatin structure, energy status and reactive oxygen species production of mouse morulae and blastocysts.

methodsMouse morulae and blastocysts were randomly allocated into vitrification, slow freezing and control groups. For slow freezing, Dulbecco phosphate buffered saline based 10% glicerol solution was used. For vitrification, G-MOPS™ based solution supplemented with 16% ethylene glycol, 16% propylene glycol, Ficoll (10 mg/ml) and sucrose (0.65 mol/l) was used. After warming, the chromatin integrity, mitochondrial distribution pattern and energy/oxidative status were compared among groups.

resultsCryopreservation affected chromatin integrity at a greater extent at the morula than the blastocyst stage. Chromatin damage induced by slow freezing was more relevant compared to vitrification. Slow freezing and vitrification similarly affected mitochondrial distribution pattern. Greater damage was observed at the morula stage and it was associated with embryo grade. Cryopreservation altered the quantitative bioenergy/redox parameters at a greater extent in the morulae than in the blastocysts. Effects induced by slow freezing were not related to embryo grade or mitochondrial pattern, as affected embryos were of all grades and with both mitochondrial patterns. However, effects induced by vitrification were related to mitochondrial pattern, as only embryos with homogeneous mitochondrial pattern in small aggregates had reduced energy status.

conclusionsThis study shows for the first time the joint assessment of chromatin damage and mitochondrial energy/redox potential in fresh and frozen mouse embryos at the morula and blastocyst stage, allowing the comparison of the effects of the two most commonly used cryopreservation procedures.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystChromatinCryopreservationEmbryo, MammalianFemaleFreezingMiceMitochondriaMorulaOxidation-ReductionReactive Oxygen SpeciesVitrificationChromatinReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID25889099
PMCPMC4419566
OpenAlexW2151721239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.