Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25889054›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Facilitating large-scale implementation of evidence based health care: insider accounts from a co-operative inquiry.

Heather Waterman, Ruth Boaden, Lorraine Burey, Brook Howells, Gill Harvey, John Humphreys, Katy Rothwell, Michael Spence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heather WatermanSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Heather.waterman@manchester.ac.uk.
Ruth BoadenManchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth St. West, Manchester, M15 6 PB, UK. ruth.boaden@mbs.ac.uk.
Lorraine BureyCLAHRC, 3rd Floor Mayo Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK. Lorraine.burey@srft.nhs.uk.
Brook HowellsAdvancing Quality Alliance, Salford Royal NHS Foundation trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK. Brook.Butler@srft.nhs.uk.
Gill HarveyManchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth St. West, Manchester, M15 6 PB, UK. gill.harvey@mbs.ac.uk.
John HumphreysCLAHRC, 3rd Floor Mayo Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK. john.humphreys@srft.nhs.uk.
Katy RothwellCLAHRC, 3rd Floor Mayo Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK. katy.rothwell@nhs.net.
Michael SpenceCLAHRC, 3rd Floor Mayo Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK. Michael.spence@srft.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFacilitators are known to be influential in the implementation of evidence-based health care (EBHC). However, little evidence exists on what it is that they do to support the implementation process. This research reports on how knowledge transfer associates (KTAs) working as part of the UK National Institute for Health Research 'Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care' for Greater Manchester (GM CLAHRC) facilitated the implementation of EBHC across several commissioning and provider health care agencies.

methodsA prospective co-operative inquiry with eight KTAs was carried out comprising of 11 regular group meetings where they reflected critically on their experiences. Twenty interviews were also conducted with other members of the GM CLAHRC Implementation Team to gain their perspectives of the KTAs facilitation role and process.

resultsThere were four phases to the facilitation of EBHC on a large scale: (1) Assisting with the decision on what EBHC to implement, in this phase, KTAs pulled together people and disparate strands of information to facilitate a decision on which EBHC should be implemented; (2) Planning of the implementation of EBHC, in which KTAs spent time gathering additional information and going between key people to plan the implementation; (3) Coordinating and implementing EBHC when KTAs recruited general practices and people for the implementation of EBHC; and (4) Evaluating the EBHC which required the KTAs to set up (new) systems to gather data for analysis. Over time, the KTAs demonstrated growing confidence and skills in aspects of facilitation: research, interpersonal communication, project management and change management skills.

conclusionThe findings provide prospective empirical data on the large scale implementation of EBHC in primary care and community based organisations focusing on resources and processes involved. Detailed evidence shows facilitation is context dependent and that 'one size does not fits all'. Co-operative inquiry was a useful method to enhance KTAs learning. The evidence shows that facilitators need tailored support and education, during the process of implementation to provide them with a well-rounded skill-set. Our study was not designed to demonstrate how facilitators contribute to patient health outcomes thus further prospective research is required.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDiffusion of InnovationEvidence-Based PracticeGuideline AdherenceCooperative BehaviorHealth Services ResearchHumansInterviews as TopicLeadershipPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchResearch PersonnelUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID25889054
PMCPMC4339083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.