Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888980›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2015

Effect of the CCND1 A870G polymorphism on prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 3,820 cases and 3,825 controls.

Min Zheng, Lijun Wan, Xiang He, Xiaolong Qi, Feng Liu, Da-Hong Zhang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Association betweenBioscience reports · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Influence of CCND1 G870A polymorphism on the risk of HBV-related HCC and cyclin D1 splicing variant expression in Chinese population.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Min ZhengDepartment of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, No.158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China. zhengminzj@163.com.
Lijun WanDepartment of Urology, Quzhou People's Hospital, No. 2 Zhongloudi Street, Quzhou, 310014, China. quzhouwanlijun@163.com.
Xiang HeDepartment of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, No.158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China. wangyuanyuzj@163.com.
Xiaolong QiDepartment of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, No.158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China. Lililizj@126.com.
Feng LiuDepartment of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, No.158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China. Hexujunzj@126.com.
Da-Hong ZhangDepartment of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, No.158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China. urology@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCyclin D1 (CCND1) is critical in the transition of the cell cycle from the G1 to S phases, and unbalanced cell cycle regulation is a hallmark of carcinogenesis. Numerous epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between the CCND1 A870G polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer (PCa). However, these studies have yielded conflicting results.

methodsIn the present study, the possible association above was assessed by a meta-analysis. Eligible articles were identified for the period up to July 2014. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were appropriately derived from fixed effects or random effects models.

resultsA total of ten case-control studies, which included 3,820 cases and 3,825 controls, were identified. Overall, the allelic/genotypic association between the G870A polymorphism and prostate cancer was nonsignificant (OR = 1.045, 95% CI = 0.947 to 1.153 for A versus G, P = 0.380; OR = 1.088, 95% CI = 0.896 to 1.321 for AA versus GG, P = 0.393; OR = 1.044, 95% CI = 0.941 to 1.158 for GA versus GG, P = 0.414; OR = 1.053, 95% CI = 0.955 to 1.161 for the dominant model AA + GA versus GG, P = 0.303; OR = 1.072, 95% CI = 0.881 to 1.306 for the recessive model AA versus AA + GA, P = 0.486). Moreover, subgroup analyses according to ethnicity failed to demonstrate a significant association between this polymorphism and prostate cancer. In addition, we also performed a stratified analysis of cases with PCa metastasis, and the results supported the findings of no significant association between CCND1 A870G polymorphism and metastasis risk of PCa.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the CCND1 A870G polymorphism might not be a potential candidate for predicting prostate cancer risk, including metastasis risk.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseCase-Control StudiesCyclin D1HumansMalePolymorphism, GeneticPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsCCND1 protein, humanCyclin D1

Identifiers

PMID25888980
PMCPMC4344796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.