Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888966›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2015

Salvage radiotherapy in patients with local recurrent esophageal cancer after radical radiochemotherapy.

Zhi-guo Zhou, Chan-jun Zhen, Wen-wen Bai, Ping Zhang, Xue-ying Qiao, Jun-li Liang, Xian-shu Gao, Shuo-shuo Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Pentixafor PET/CT for imaging of chemokine receptor 4 expression in esophageal cancer - a first clinical approach.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhi-guo ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China. chenk777@126.com.
Chan-jun ZhenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011, China. 1026609441@qq.com.
Wen-wen BaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011, China. 284479739@qq.com.
Ping ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011, China. zpsjz@sohu.com.
Xue-ying QiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011, China. xueying_qiao@126.com.
Jun-li LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011, China. nienannan@126.com.
Xian-shu GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China. gaoxianshu777@126.com.
Shuo-shuo WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011, China. zhou_pr@sohu.com.
Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CNHebei Medical University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the salvage radiotherapy outcome in patients with local recurrent esophageal cancer after radical radiochemotherapy (RCT).

methodsA total of 114 patients with local recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after initial radical RCT were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-five (55) patients belonged to the salvage radiotherapy group (SR group) and 59 patients to the non-salvage radiotherapy group (NSR group).

resultsThe median survival time after-recurrence was 4 months in all patients. The 1, 2, 3 year overall survival (OS) rates were 83.6%, 41.8% and 21.8% respectively in the SR group, and 57.6%, 16.9%, and 8.5% in the NSR group. The 6-month and 1-year survival rates after-recurrence were 41.8% and 16.4% respectively in the SR group, and 11.9% and 3.4% respectively in the NSR group. A salvage radiation dose > 50 Gy after initial radical RCT, improved the survival of patients with local recurrent esophageal cancer. Three patients (5.45%) from the SR group showed more than 3-grade radiation pneumonitis. In addition, esophageal fistula/perforation was observed in 11 cases (20.0%) in the SR group and in 8 cases (13.6%) in the NSR group.

conclusionsSalvage treatment after definitive RCT may improve the overall survival and survival after-recurrence of patients with local recurrent esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

RadiotherapyAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapySurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID25888966
PMCPMC4351944
OpenAlexW2102418568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.