Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888957›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2015

The effect of dosing strategies on the therapeutic efficacy of artesunate-amodiaquine for uncomplicated malaria: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) AS-AQ Study Group, Martin A Adjuik, Richard Allan, Anupkumar R Anvikar, Elizabeth A Ashley, Mamadou S Ba, Hubert Barennes, Karen I Barnes, Quique Bassat, Elisabeth Baudin and 97 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

107 authors.

WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) AS-AQ Study Group
Martin A Adjuik
Richard Allan
Anupkumar R Anvikar
Elizabeth A Ashley
Mamadou S Ba
Hubert Barennes
Karen I Barnes
Quique Bassat
Elisabeth Baudin
Anders Björkman
François Bompart
Maryline Bonnet
Steffen Borrmann
Philippe Brasseur
Hasifa Bukirwa
Francesco Checchi
Michel Cot
Prabin Dahal
Umberto D'Alessandro
Philippe Deloron
Meghna Desai
Graciela Diap
Abdoulaye A Djimde
Grant Dorsey
Ogobara K Doumbo
Emmanuelle Espié
Jean-Francois Etard
Caterina I Fanello
Jean-François Faucher
Babacar Faye
Jennifer A Flegg
Oumar Gaye
Peter W Gething
Raquel González
Francesco Grandesso
Philippe J Guerin
Jean-Paul Guthmann
Sally Hamour
Armedy Ronny Hasugian
Simon I Hay
Georgina S Humphreys
Vincent Jullien
Elizabeth Juma
Moses R Kamya
Corine Karema
Jean R Kiechel
Peter G Kremsner
Sanjeev Krishna
Valérie Lameyre
Laminou M Ibrahim
Sue J Lee
Bertrand Lell
Andreas Mårtensson
Achille Massougbodji
Hervé Menan
Didier Ménard
Clara Menéndez
Martin Meremikwu
Clarissa Moreira
Carolyn Nabasumba
Michael Nambozi
Jean-Louis Ndiaye
Frederic Nikiema
Christian Nsanzabana
Francine Ntoumi
Bernhards R Ogutu
Piero Olliaro
Lyda Osorio
Jean-Bosco Ouédraogo
Louis K Penali
Mbaye Pene
Loretxu Pinoges
Patrice Piola
Ric N Price
Cally Roper
Philip J Rosenthal
Claude Emile Rwagacondo
Albert Same-Ekobo
Birgit Schramm
Amadou Seck
Bhawna Sharma
Carol Hopkins Sibley
Véronique Sinou
Sodiomon B Sirima
Jeffery J Smith
Frank Smithuis
Fabrice A Somé
Doudou Sow
Sarah G Staedke
Kasia Stepniewska
Todd D Swarthout
Khadime Sylla
Ambrose O Talisuna
Joel Tarning
Walter R J Taylor
Emmanuel A Temu
Julie I Thwing
Emiliana Tjitra
Roger C K Tine
Halidou Tinto
Michel T Vaillant
Neena Valecha
Ingrid Van den Broek
Nicholas J White
Adoke Yeka
Issaka Zongo

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A900_1119Wellcome Trust 091625Wellcome Trust 093956Wellcome Trust 095066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) is one of the most widely used artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) to treat uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Africa. We investigated the impact of different dosing strategies on the efficacy of this combination for the treatment of falciparum malaria.

methodsIndividual patient data from AS-AQ clinical trials were pooled using the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) standardised methodology. Risk factors for treatment failure were identified using a Cox regression model with shared frailty across study sites.

resultsForty-three studies representing 9,106 treatments from 1999-2012 were included in the analysis; 4,138 (45.4%) treatments were with a fixed dose combination with an AQ target dose of 30 mg/kg (FDC), 1,293 (14.2%) with a non-fixed dose combination with an AQ target dose of 25 mg/kg (loose NFDC-25), 2,418 (26.6%) with a non-fixed dose combination with an AQ target dose of 30 mg/kg (loose NFDC-30), and the remaining 1,257 (13.8%) with a co-blistered non-fixed dose combination with an AQ target dose of 30 mg/kg (co-blistered NFDC). The median dose of AQ administered was 32.1 mg/kg [IQR: 25.9-38.2], the highest dose being administered to patients treated with co-blistered NFDC (median = 35.3 mg/kg [IQR: 30.6-43.7]) and the lowest to those treated with loose NFDC-25 (median = 25.0 mg/kg [IQR: 22.7-25.0]). Patients treated with FDC received a median dose of 32.4 mg/kg [IQR: 27-39.0]. After adjusting for reinfections, the corrected antimalarial efficacy on day 28 after treatment was similar for co-blistered NFDC (97.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 97.0-98.8%]) and FDC (98.1% [95% CI: 97.6%-98.5%]; P = 0.799), but significantly lower for the loose NFDC-25 (93.4% [95% CI: 91.9%-94.9%]), and loose NFDC-30 (95.0% [95% CI: 94.1%-95.9%]) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). After controlling for age, AQ dose, baseline parasitemia and region; treatment with loose NFDC-25 was associated with a 3.5-fold greater risk of recrudescence by day 28 (adjusted hazard ratio, AHR = 3.51 [95% CI: 2.02-6.12], P < 0.001) compared to FDC, and treatment with loose NFDC-30 was associated with a higher risk of recrudescence at only three sites.

conclusionsThere was substantial variation in the total dose of amodiaquine administered in different AS-AQ combination regimens. Fixed dose AS-AQ combinations ensure optimal dosing and provide higher antimalarial treatment efficacy than the loose individual tablets in all age categories.

Indexed as

AfricaAmodiaquineAntimalarialsArtemisininsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansMalaria, FalciparumMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAmodiaquineamodiaquine, artesunate drug combinationAntimalarialsArtemisininsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID25888957
PMCPMC4411752
OpenAlexW1953616655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.