Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888940›Full record

ArticleDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2015

Artemia salina as a model organism in toxicity assessment of nanoparticles.

Somayeh Rajabi, Ali Ramazani, Mehrdad Hamidi, Tahereh Naji

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 283 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phytochemical Profile and Bioactive Potential ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comprehensive Characterization ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Green Synthesis of Tin Oxide (SnOApplied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Fabrication of3 Biotech · 2025
    Article
  13. Novel Lectins fromACS omega · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Somayeh RajabiCell and Molecular Biology Departments, Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. rajabisomaye98@yahoo.com.
Ali RamazaniCell and Molecular Biology Departments, Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. ramazania@zums.ac.ir.
Mehrdad HamidiZanjan Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology Research Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran. hamidim@zums.ac.ir.
Tahereh NajiCell and Molecular Biology Departments, Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. tnaji2002@gmail.com.
Islamic Azad University Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause of expanding presence of nanomaterials, there has been an increase in the exposure of humans to nanoparticles that is why nanotoxicology studies are important. A number of studies on the effects of nanomatrials in in vitro and in vivo systems have been published. Currently cytotoxicity of different nanoparticles is assessed using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay on different cell lines to determine cell viability, a tedious and expensive method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Artemia salina test in comparison with the MTT assay in the assessment of cytotoxicity of nanostructures because the former method is more rapid and convenient and less expensive.

methodsAt the first stage, toxicity of different nanoparticles with different concentrations (1.56-400 μg/mL) was measured by means of the brine shrimp lethality test. At the second stage, the effect of nanoparticles on the viability of the L929 cell line was assessed using the MTT assay. Experiments were conducted with each concentration in triplicate.

resultsThe results obtained from both tests (A. salina test and MTT assay) did not have statistically significant differences (P>0.05).

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the A. salina test may expedite toxicity experiments and decrease costs, and therefore, may be considered an alternative to the in vitro cell culture assay.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsArtemiaCell Culture TechniquesCell LineCell SurvivalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEnvironmental MonitoringMiceNanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID25888940
PMCPMC4344789
OpenAlexW2141376351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.